Methodologies and cell lines used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Chlamydia spp
- PMID: 12543671
- PMCID: PMC151736
- DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.2.636-642.2003
Methodologies and cell lines used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Chlamydia spp
Abstract
In vitro susceptibility testing was performed on strains of Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Chlamydia psittaci under various conditions, including the cell line utilized, the time between infection and the addition of an antimicrobial, the concentration of inoculum, and the effect of multiple passage on the minimal chlamydicidal concentrations for the antibiotics doxycycline, azithromycin, erythromycin, ofloxacin, and tetracycline. With macrolides, the MIC varied depending upon the cell line utilized. With all antimicrobials, the MIC was related to the time at which the antimicrobial was added after infection. By an optimized cell culture passage method, all strains of chlamydia tested demonstrated survival after exposure to high levels (>100 times the MIC) of antimicrobials. Furthermore, upon retest, these surviving organisms did not demonstrate increased MICs. Thus, this phenomenon does not reflect selection of antimicrobial-resistant mutants but rather survival of some organisms in high antimicrobial concentrations (heterotypic survival). An additional 44 clinical isolates of C. trachomatis from patients with single-incident infections were tested against those from patients with recurrent or persistent infections, and heterotypic survival was seen in all isolates tested; hence, in vitro resistance did not correlate with the patient's apparent clinical outcome.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Chlamydia trachomatis isolates from patients with persistent or successfully treated infections.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Mar 1;73(3):680-686. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx454. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018. PMID: 29207004
-
In vitro evaluation of activities of azithromycin, erythromycin, and tetracycline against Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Feb;36(2):291-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.2.291. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992. PMID: 1318677 Free PMC article.
-
Association of the in vitro susceptibility of clinical isolates of chlamydia trachomatis with serovar and duration of antibiotic exposure.Sex Transm Dis. 2015 Mar;42(3):115-9. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000241. Sex Transm Dis. 2015. PMID: 25668641
-
Evaluation of antimicrobial resistance and treatment failures for Chlamydia trachomatis: a meeting report.J Infect Dis. 2005 Mar 15;191(6):917-23. doi: 10.1086/428290. Epub 2005 Feb 11. J Infect Dis. 2005. PMID: 15717267 Review.
-
[Determining antimicrobial resistance to Chlamydia trachomatis and applying present findings in daily practice].Med Glas (Zenica). 2010 Feb;7(1):26-31. Med Glas (Zenica). 2010. PMID: 20387721 Review. Croatian.
Cited by
-
Treatment challenges for urogenital and anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis.BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Jul 29;15:293. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1030-9. BMC Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 26220080 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Repeat infections with chlamydia in women may be more transcriptionally active with lower responses from some immune genes.Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;10:1012835. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1012835. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36299763 Free PMC article.
-
Chlamydia trachomatis and Genital Mycoplasmas: Pathogens with an Impact on Human Reproductive Health.J Pathog. 2014;2014:183167. doi: 10.1155/2014/183167. Epub 2014 Dec 31. J Pathog. 2014. PMID: 25614838 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Antibiotic susceptibility of Waddlia chondrophila in Acanthamoeba castellanii amoebae.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Jun;53(6):2663-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00046-09. Epub 2009 Mar 30. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009. PMID: 19332673 Free PMC article.
-
Novel Detection Strategy To Rapidly Evaluate the Efficacy of Antichlamydial Agents.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Jan 24;61(2):e02202-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02202-16. Print 2017 Feb. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017. PMID: 27855081 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Andersen, A. A., and K. G. Rogers. 1998. Resistance to tetracycline and sulfadiazine in swine C. trachomatis isolates, p. 313-316. In R. S. Stephens, G. I. Byrne, G. Christiansen, I. N. Clarke, J. T. Grayston, R. G. Rank, G. L. Ridgeway, P. Saikku, J. Schachter, and W. E. Stamm (ed.), Chlamydial infections. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Human Chlamydial Infection, Napa, Calif. Berkeley University Press, Berkeley, Calif.
-
- Barnes, R. C., R. E. Roddy, and W. E. Stamm. 1986. Serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis causing repeated genital infection, p. 503-507. In D. Oriel, G. Ridgway, J. Schachter, D. Taylor-Robinson, and M. Ward (ed.), Chlamydial infections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
-
- Blythe, M. J., B. P. Katz, B. E. Batteiger, J. A. Ganser, and R. B. Jones. 1992. Recurrent genitourinary chlamydial infections in sexually active female adolescents. J. Pediatr. 121:487-493. - PubMed
-
- Catalan, F., A. Milovanovic, C. Prouteau, and M. Soulignac. 1998. Evaluation of in vitro activity of ofloxacin against 73 strains of Chlamydia trachomatis isolated form gynecologic infections. Pathol. Biol. (Paris) 46:144-146. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous