Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jan 25;326(7382):188.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7382.188.

NHS waiting lists and evidence of national or local failure: analysis of health service data

Affiliations

NHS waiting lists and evidence of national or local failure: analysis of health service data

Richard M Martin et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the national distribution of prolonged waiting for elective day case and inpatient surgery, and to examine associations of prolonged waiting with markers of NHS capacity, activity in the independent sector, and need.

Setting: NHS hospital trusts in England.

Population: People waiting for elective treatment in the specialties of general surgery; ear, nose and throat surgery; ophthalmic surgery; and trauma and orthopaedic surgery.

Main outcome measure: Numbers of people waiting six months or longer (prolonged waiting). Characteristics of trusts with large numbers waiting six months or longer were examined by using logistic regression.

Results: The distribution of numbers of people waiting for day case or elective surgery in all the specialties examined was highly positively skewed. Between 52% and 83% of patients waiting longer than six months in the specialties studied were found in one quarter of trusts, which in turn contributed 23-45% of the national throughput specific to the specialty. In general, there was little evidence to show that capacity (measured by numbers of operating theatres, dedicated day case theatres, available beds, and bed occupancy rate) or independent sector activity were associated with prolonged waiting, although exceptions were noted for individual specialties. There was consistent evidence showing an increase in prolonged waiting, with increased numbers of anaesthetists across all specialties and with increased bed occupancy rates for ear, nose and throat surgery. Markers of greater need for health care, such as deprivation score and rate of limiting long term illness, were inversely associated with prolonged waiting.

Conclusion: In most instances, substantial numbers of patients waiting unacceptably long periods for elective surgery were limited to a small number of hospitals. Little and inconsistent support was found for associations of prolonged waiting with markers of capacity, independent sector activity, or need in the surgical specialties examined.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of patients waiting longer than six months in NHS trusts in England, December 1999
Figure 2
Figure 2
Geographical distribution of trusts with the most (top 25% of the distribution) patients with prolonged waits in relation to all other trusts: England, 1999—inpatient elective surgery
Figure 3
Figure 3
Geographical distribution of trusts with the most (top 25% of the distribution) patients with prolonged waits in relation to all other trusts: England, 1999—day case surgery

Comment in

References

    1. DeCoster C, Carriere KC, Peterson S, Walld R, MacWilliam L. Waiting times for surgical procedures. Med Care. 1999;37:JS187–205. - PubMed
    1. Bosch X. Catalonia tries to tackle growing waiting lists. BMJ. 1998;316:885. - PubMed
    1. Grouden M, Sheehan S, Colgan MP, Moore D, Shanik G. Results and lessons to be learned from a waiting list initiative. Ir Med J. 1998;91:90–91. - PubMed
    1. Clover KA, Dobbins TA, Smyth TJ, Sanson-Fisher RW. Factors associated with waiting time for surgery. Med J Aust. 1998;169:464–468. - PubMed
    1. Derrett S, Paul C, Morris J. Waiting for elective surgery: effects on health-related quality of life. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999;11:47–50. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms