Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2002 Dec;37(6):1531-51.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.10562.

The lack of effect of market structure on hospice use

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The lack of effect of market structure on hospice use

Theodore J Iwashyna et al. Health Serv Res. 2002 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the relative importance of health care market structure and county-level demographics in determining rates of hospice use.

Data sources: Medicare claims data for a cohort of elderly patients newly diagnosed with lung cancer, colon cancer, stroke, or heart attack in 1993, followed for up to five years, and linked to Census and Area Resource File data.

Study design: Variation between markets in rates of hospice use by patients with serious illness was examined after taking into account differences in individual-level data using hierarchical linear models. The relative explanatory power of market-level structure and local demographic variables was compared.

Data collection methods: The cohort was defined within the Medicare hospital claims data using validated algorithms to detect incident cases of disease with a three-year lookback. Use of hospice was determined by linkage at an individual level to the Standard Analytic Files for Hospice through 1997. Individual-level data was linked to the Area Resource File using county identifiers present in the Medicare claims.

Principal findings: There is substantial variation in hospice use across markets. This variation is not explained by differences in the major components of health care infrastructure: the availability of hospital, nursing home, or skilled nursing facilities, nor by the availability of HMOs, doctors, or generalists.

Conclusions: Intercounty heterogeneity in hospice use is substantial, and may not be related to the set-up of the medical care system. The important local factors may be local preferences, differences in the particular mix of services provided by local hospices, or differences in community leadership on end of life-issues; many of these differences may be amenable to educational efforts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of Total Deaths that Were Cared for Under the Medicare Hospice Benefit in 1993, by County

References

    1. Allison PD. Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1995.
    1. Banaszak-Holl J, Zinn JS, Mor V. “The Impact of Market and Organizational Characteristics on Nursing Care Facility Service Innovation: A Resource Dependency Perspective.”. Health Services Research. 1996;31:97–117. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benesch C, Witter DM, Jr, Wilder AL, Duncan PW, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. “Inaccuracy of the International Classification of Disease (ICD-9-CM) in Identifying the Diagnosis of Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease.”. Neurology. 1997;49:660–4. - PubMed
    1. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW. Hierarchical Linear Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1992.
    1. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. “A New Method of Classifying Prognostic Comorbidity in Longitudinal Studies: Development and Validation.”. Journal of Chronic Disease. 1987;40:373–83. - PubMed

Publication types