Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2002 Dec;37(6):1643-57.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.10912.

Using Medicare data to estimate the prevalence of breast cancer screening in older women: comparison of different methods to identify screening mammograms

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Using Medicare data to estimate the prevalence of breast cancer screening in older women: comparison of different methods to identify screening mammograms

Whitney M Randolph et al. Health Serv Res. 2002 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare different methods for defining screening mammograms with Medicare claims and their impact on estimates of breast cancer screening rates.

Methods: Medicare outpatient facility and physician claims for 61,962 women in 1993 and 59,652 women in 1998 were reviewed for evidence of receipt of screening mammography. We compared the estimates of screening mammography use derived from CPT (Current Procedure Terminology) codes to categorize mammograms as screening or diagnostic versus using an algorithm that uses CPT codes plus breast-related diagnoses in the prior two years. We also compared estimates obtained from review of physician claims alone, facility claims alone, or the combination of the two sources of claims.

Results: Use of physician claims alone produced estimates of screening rates similar to rates calculated from use of both physician and outpatient (facility) claims. In 1993, the CPT code for screening mammography underestimated the rate of screening compared to estimates generated by using the algorithm (8.3 percent versus 18.0 percent prevalence, p<0.001). By 1998, the screening prevalence rate generated from using the CPT code for screening mammography more closely approximated the rate generated by the algorithm (23.0 percent versus 25.1 percent). By all methods of estimating screening mammography with Medicare claims, its prevalence increased substantially between 1993 and 1998.

Conclusion: Providers increased their use of the screening mammography code in their charges to Medicare during the 1990s. This has improved the claims' ability to distinguish screening from diagnostic mammograms, but screening rates computed with claims continue to fall below those generated from self-reports of mammography use among general populations of older women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Algorithm Used to Classify Mammograms as Screening or Diagnostic

References

    1. AGS Clinical Practice Committee. “Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women.American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Position Statement.”. 1999. [March 29, 2002]. Available at http://www.americangeriatrics.org/products/positionpapers/brstcncr.shtml.. - PubMed
    1. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Quality Determinants of Mammography. Clinical Practice Guideline Number 13. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1994. AHCPR Publication no. 95-0632
    1. American Cancer Society. “Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 1999–2000.”. 2001. [April 27]. Available at http://www3.cancer.org/cancerinfo/sitecenter.asp..
    1. Anonymous “Use of Mammography Services by Women Age > or=65 Years Enrolled in Medicare—United States, 1991–1993.”. MMWR—Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report44. 1995;44:777–81. - PubMed
    1. Beam CA, Layde PM, Sullivan DC. Variability in the Interpretation of Screening Mammograms by U.S. Radiologists. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1996;156:209–13. - PubMed

Publication types