Focus on the individual--quality of life assessments in oncology
- PMID: 12546523
- DOI: 10.1080/028418602320807775
Focus on the individual--quality of life assessments in oncology
Abstract
In this review we investigate how assessments of quality of life (QoL) can be used in daily clinical practice. The focus is on individualized QoL assessments, but computerized-adaptive testing and interpretation of QoL scores are also considered. Quality of life (QoL) measurements have been used relatively infrequently in clinical practice, although individualized care planning and follow-up based on QoL information may lead to better outcomes of treatment and informed and autonomous decision-making by patients. A recent approach in assessing QoL is by individualized measures, which tap QoL as defined by the individual patient. Individualized QoL instruments, such as the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL) and the Patient-Generated Index (PGI), have obvious appeal for use in clinical practice, since they incorporate topics of greatest concern to the individual patient, while also capturing their ratings and weightings. However, before general use in daily clinical practice can be recommended, some aspects of these instruments require further research, particularly issues concerning reliability, feasibility, interpretation and effectiveness.
Similar articles
-
Comparing two versions of the Schedule for Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life in patients with advanced cancer.Acta Oncol. 2011 Jun;50(5):648-52. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.557088. Epub 2011 Feb 16. Acta Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21323492
-
Domains of quality of life freely expressed by cancer patients and their caregivers: contribution of the SEIQoL.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 12;15(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0672-2. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017. PMID: 28494773 Free PMC article.
-
Quality-of-life measurement in advanced cancer: assessing the individual.J Clin Oncol. 1999 Nov;17(11):3603-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.11.3603. J Clin Oncol. 1999. PMID: 10550160
-
Quality of life measurements: a soft outcome--or is it?Am J Manag Care. 2002 Dec;8(18 Suppl):S574-9. Am J Manag Care. 2002. PMID: 12512981 Review.
-
A review of the application, feasibility, and the psychometric properties of the individualized measures in cancer.Qual Life Res. 2017 May;26(5):1091-1104. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1458-4. Epub 2016 Nov 18. Qual Life Res. 2017. PMID: 27864742 Review.
Cited by
-
Living with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: decent care-insufficient medical and genetic information: a qualitative study of MEN 1 patients in a Swedish hospital.J Genet Couns. 2007 Feb;16(1):105-17. doi: 10.1007/s10897-006-9047-2. Epub 2007 Feb 3. J Genet Couns. 2007. PMID: 17277996
-
Which Factors Influence the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Dutch Physiotherapy Practice? A Cross-Sectional Study.Physiother Can. 2020 Winter;72(1):63-70. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2018-0028. Physiother Can. 2020. PMID: 34385750 Free PMC article.
-
Individual quality of life: adaptive conjoint analysis as an alternative for direct weighting?Qual Life Res. 2008 May;17(4):641-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9325-6. Qual Life Res. 2008. PMID: 18398699 Free PMC article.
-
Design and Evaluation of the Electronic Patient-Generated Index.Nurs Res. 2020 May/Jun;69(3):227-232. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000405. Nurs Res. 2020. PMID: 31688339 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of reconceptualization response shift on rating of quality of life over time among people with advanced cancer.Support Care Cancer. 2018 Sep;26(9):3063-3071. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4156-7. Epub 2018 Mar 21. Support Care Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29564622
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous