Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Jan;29(1):85-8.
doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01500-6.

Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation

János Németh et al. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the precision, reproducibility, and applicability of an optical method based on partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation.

Setting: Ultrasound laboratory of a university eye hospital.

Methods: A prospective comparison of measurements made by the IOLMaster optical instrument (Carl Zeiss) and Ultrascan Digital 2000 contact ultrasound A-scan (Alcon) for IOL calculations was performed. Examined were 255 eyes of 134 persons (204 phakic, 47 pseudophakic, and 4 aphakic). The mean age of the patients was 67.9 years (range 7 to 94 years).

Results: The IOLMaster measurements were successful in more than 80% of cases: in 82%, 99%, and 99% for axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and keratometry measurements, respectively. The reproducibility of the AL and ACD measurements was very high (coefficient of variation 0.13% and 2.20%, respectively). The AL and ACD values were significantly larger with the IOLMaster (P <.001) than with the Ultrascan Digital 2000. The correlation between ultrasound and optical AL measurements was high (r = 0.985; P <.001); however, there was no correlation between ACD measurements (r = 0.079; P =.397). The corneal refractive power measurements of a Javal-type keratometer and the IOLMaster were highly correlated (r = 0.955; P <.001), with a mean difference of 0.2 diopter.

Conclusions: The results show that measurements for IOL calculation are easy and precise with the optical method. It is a noncontact method, so no anesthesia is needed and there is no risk of infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources