Effects of patents and licenses on the provision of clinical genetic testing services
- PMID: 12552073
- PMCID: PMC1907368
- DOI: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60444-8
Effects of patents and licenses on the provision of clinical genetic testing services
Abstract
The growth of patents that include genetic sequences has been accompanied by concern about their impact on the ability of physicians to provide clinical genetic testing services and to perform research. Therefore, we conducted a survey of clinical laboratory directors that perform DNA-based genetic tests to examine potential effects. We performed a telephone survey between July and September in 2001 of all laboratory directors in the United States who were members of the Association for Molecular Pathology or who were listed on the GENETESTS:org website. One hundred thirty-two of 211 (63%) laboratory directors were interviewed. Ten of these were excluded because they did not conduct DNA-based genetic tests. Almost all performed genetic tests for clinical purposes. Half performed tests for research purposes as well. Twenty-five percent of respondents reported that they had stopped performing a clinical genetic test because of a patent or license. Fifty-three percent of respondents reported deciding not to develop a new clinical genetic test because of a patent or license. In total, respondents were prevented from performing 12 genetic tests, and all of these tests were among those performed by a large number of laboratories. We found 22 patents that were relevant to the performance of these 12 tests. Fifteen of the 22 patents (68%) are held by universities or research institutes, and 13 of the 22 patents (59%) were based on research funded by the United States Government. Overall, respondents reported that their perceptions of the effects of patents on the cost, access, and development of genetic tests, or data sharing among researchers, were negative. In contrast, most respondents felt that patents did not have an effect on the quality of testing. We conclude that patents and licenses have had a significant effect on the ability of clinical laboratories to develop and provide genetic tests. Furthermore, our findings suggest that clinical geneticists feel that their research is inhibited by patents. The effects of patents and licenses on patients' access to tests, and the costs and quality thereof, remains to be determined.
Similar articles
-
Impact of gene patents and licensing practices on access to genetic testing for cystic fibrosis.Genet Med. 2010 Apr;12(4 Suppl):S194-211. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181d7cf7d. Genet Med. 2010. PMID: 20393308 Free PMC article.
-
Do patents impede the provision of genetic tests in Australia?Aust Health Rev. 2013 Jun;37(3):281-5. doi: 10.1071/AH13029. Aust Health Rev. 2013. PMID: 23702081
-
Spinocerebellar ataxia: patient and health professional perspectives on whether and how patents affect access to clinical genetic testing.Genet Med. 2010 Apr;12(4 Suppl):S83-S110. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181d67e44. Genet Med. 2010. PMID: 20393313 Free PMC article.
-
The fate and future of patents on human genes and genetic diagnostic methods.Nat Rev Genet. 2012 May 18;13(6):441-8. doi: 10.1038/nrg3255. Nat Rev Genet. 2012. PMID: 22596320 Review.
-
Human gene patents.Acad Med. 2002 Dec;77(12 Pt 2):1315-28. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200212001-00003. Acad Med. 2002. PMID: 12480642 Review.
Cited by
-
Defining the spectrum of genome policy.Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Dec;7(12):966-72. doi: 10.1038/nrg2003. Nat Rev Genet. 2006. PMID: 17139328 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Medical ethics for the genome world: a paper from the 2007 William Beaumont hospital symposium on molecular pathology.J Mol Diagn. 2008 Sep;10(5):377-82. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2008.070162. Epub 2008 Aug 7. J Mol Diagn. 2008. PMID: 18687790 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Genetic testing and common disorders in a public health framework: how to assess relevance and possibilities. Background Document to the ESHG recommendations on genetic testing and common disorders.Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Apr;19 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6-44. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.249. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011. PMID: 21412252 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
The phantom menace of gene patents.Nature. 2009 Mar 26;458(7237):407-8. doi: 10.1038/458407a. Nature. 2009. PMID: 19325609 No abstract available.
-
Patent Ethics: The Misalignment of Views Between the Patent System and the Wider Society.Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Oct;24(5):1551-1576. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9956-5. Epub 2017 Aug 15. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018. PMID: 28812235
References
-
- Poste G: The case for genomic patenting. Nature 1995, 378:534-536 - PubMed
-
- Doll J: The patenting of DNA. Science 1998, 280:689-690 - PubMed
-
- Heller M, Eisenberg R: Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 1998, 280:698-701 - PubMed
-
- Cho M: Ethical and legal issues in the 21st century. Preparing for the Millennium: Laboratory Medicine in the 21st Century. 1998:47-53 AACC Press, Washington, DC
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources