Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study
- PMID: 12553391
- DOI: 10.1017/s0265021503000127
Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study
Abstract
Background and objective: The LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is a new laryngeal mask airway with a modified cuff and drainage tube. We compared oropharyngeal leak pressure, intracuff pressure and anatomical position (assessed fibreoptically) for the Size 5 LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the classic laryngeal mask airway in different head-neck positions and using different intracuff inflation volumes.
Methods: Thirty paralysed anaesthetized adult male patients were studied. The LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the classic laryngeal mask airway were inserted into each patient in random order. The oropharyngeal leak pressure, intracuff pressure, and anatomical position of the airway tube and drainage tube (LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway only) were documented in four head and neck positions (neutral first, then flexion, extension and rotation in random order), and at 0-40 mL cuff volumes in the neutral position in 10 mL increments.
Results: Compared with the neutral position, the oropharyngeal leak pressure for both the LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the classic laryngeal mask airway was higher in flexion and rotation (all P < or = 0.02), but lower in extension (all P < or = 0.01). Changes in head-neck position did not alter the anatomical position of the airway tube or the drainage tube. The oropharyngeal leak pressure was always higher for the LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (all P < or = 0.005) and anatomical position better for the classic laryngeal mask airway (all P < or = 0.04).
Conclusions: The anatomical position of the LMA-ProSeal and the classic laryngeal mask airway is stable in different head-neck positions, but head-neck flexion and rotation are associated with an increase, and head-neck extension a decrease, in oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure. The Size 5 LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is capable of forming a more effective seal than the Size 5 classic laryngeal mask airway in males.
Similar articles
-
The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway.Anesth Analg. 1999 Apr;88(4):913-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199904000-00042. Anesth Analg. 1999. PMID: 10195547 Clinical Trial.
-
The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.Anaesthesia. 2009 Jan;64(1):79-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05682.x. Anaesthesia. 2009. PMID: 19087011 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of the reinforced and standard laryngeal mask airway: ease of insertion and the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure.Anaesth Intensive Care. 1999 Dec;27(6):628-31. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9902700612. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1999. PMID: 10631418 Clinical Trial.
-
Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.J Clin Anesth. 2016 Sep;33:298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 May 18. J Clin Anesth. 2016. PMID: 27555181 Review.
-
Influence of head and neck position on the performance of supraglottic airway devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2019 May 9;14(5):e0216673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216673. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31071171 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Conditions for laryngeal mask airway placement in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure: a comparison between blind insertion and laryngoscope-guided insertion.BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jan 5;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0674-6. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019. PMID: 30611202 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the I-Gel™ in the different head-and-neck positions in anaesthetised paralysed children: A randomised controlled trial.Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;62(2):103-108. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_594_17. Indian J Anaesth. 2018. PMID: 29491514 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Pneumoperitoneum and Lateral Position on Oropharyngeal Seal Pressures of Proseal LMA in Laparoscopic Urological Procedures.J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Feb;11(2):UC05-UC09. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/22168.9422. Epub 2017 Feb 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017. PMID: 28384963 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of McGrath videolaryngoscope-assisted insertion versus standard blind technique for flexible laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults.Singapore Med J. 2022 Jun;63(6):342-344. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2022080. Singapore Med J. 2022. PMID: 36043315 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
[Skill retention using extraglottic airways in out-of-hospital emergencies: efficacy and long-term results of simulator-based medical education : A prospective follow-up study].Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2019 Sep;114(6):541-551. doi: 10.1007/s00063-018-0429-7. Epub 2018 Apr 11. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2019. PMID: 29644401 German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources