Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Jan 13;88(1):50-7.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600691.

Hormonal content and potency of oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk among young women

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Hormonal content and potency of oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk among young women

M D Althuis et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Recent use of oral contraceptive pills is associated with a modest risk of breast cancer among very young women. In this US population-based case-control study, we evaluated whether the excess risk associated with recent oral contraceptive use is ubiquitous for all pill types or attributable to specific oral contraceptive preparations. Hormonal content and potency of combination oral contraceptives used for the longest duration within 5 years of interview for breast cancer cases aged 20-44 years (N=1640) were compared with age-matched community controls (N=1492). Women who recently used oral contraceptives containing more than 35 microg of ethinyl oestradiol per pill were at higher risk of breast cancer than users of lower dose preparations when compared to never users (respective relative risks of 1.99 and 1.27, P(trend)<0.01). This relationship was more marked among women <35 years of age, where risks associated with high- and low-dose ethinyl oestradiol use were 3.62 and 1.91 (P(trend)<0.01), respectively. We also found significant trends of increasing breast cancer risk for pills with higher progestin and oestrogen potencies (P(trend)<0.05), which were most pronounced among women aged <35 years of age (P(trend)<0.01). Risk was similar across recently used progestin types. Our findings suggest that newer low-potency/low oestrogen dose oral contraceptives may impart a lower risk of breast cancer than that associated with earlier high-potency/high-dose preparations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boonstra H, Duran V, Northington GV, Blumenthal P, Dominguez L, Pies C (2000) The ‘boom and bust phenomenon’: the hopes, dreams, and broken promises of the contraceptive revolution. Contraception 61: 9–25 - PubMed
    1. Breslow NE, Day NE (1980) The analysis of case–control studies. In Statistical Methods in Cancer Research – Volume 1, pp 5–338. IARC Scientific Publications - PubMed
    1. Brinton LA, Daling JR, Liff JM, Schoenberg JB, Malone KE, Stanford JL, Coates RJ, Gammon MD, Hanson L, Hoover RN (1995) Oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk among younger women. J Natl Cancer Inst 87: 827–835 - PubMed
    1. Brody SA, Turkes A, Goldzieher JW (1989) Pharmacokinetics of three bioequivalent norethindrone/mestranol-50 micrograms and three norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol-35 micrograms OC formulations: are ‘low-dose’ pills really lower? Contraception 40: 269–284 - PubMed
    1. Burkman RT (2001) Oral contraceptives: current status. Clin Obstet Gynecol 44: 62–72 - PubMed

Publication types