Hormonal content and potency of oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk among young women
- PMID: 12556959
- PMCID: PMC2376784
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600691
Hormonal content and potency of oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk among young women
Abstract
Recent use of oral contraceptive pills is associated with a modest risk of breast cancer among very young women. In this US population-based case-control study, we evaluated whether the excess risk associated with recent oral contraceptive use is ubiquitous for all pill types or attributable to specific oral contraceptive preparations. Hormonal content and potency of combination oral contraceptives used for the longest duration within 5 years of interview for breast cancer cases aged 20-44 years (N=1640) were compared with age-matched community controls (N=1492). Women who recently used oral contraceptives containing more than 35 microg of ethinyl oestradiol per pill were at higher risk of breast cancer than users of lower dose preparations when compared to never users (respective relative risks of 1.99 and 1.27, P(trend)<0.01). This relationship was more marked among women <35 years of age, where risks associated with high- and low-dose ethinyl oestradiol use were 3.62 and 1.91 (P(trend)<0.01), respectively. We also found significant trends of increasing breast cancer risk for pills with higher progestin and oestrogen potencies (P(trend)<0.05), which were most pronounced among women aged <35 years of age (P(trend)<0.01). Risk was similar across recently used progestin types. Our findings suggest that newer low-potency/low oestrogen dose oral contraceptives may impart a lower risk of breast cancer than that associated with earlier high-potency/high-dose preparations.
Similar articles
-
Oral contraceptives and breast cancer.Int J Epidemiol. 1982 Dec;11(4):316-22. doi: 10.1093/ije/11.4.316. Int J Epidemiol. 1982. PMID: 7152784
-
Breast cancer among young U.S. women in relation to oral contraceptive use.J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Apr 6;86(7):505-14. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.7.505. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994. PMID: 8133534
-
Oral contraceptives: a reassessment.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989 Sep;44(9):662-8. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198909000-00005. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989. PMID: 2671844 Review.
-
Oral contraception and risk of a cerebral thromboembolic attack: results of a case-control study.BMJ. 1993 Apr 10;306(6883):956-63. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6883.956. BMJ. 1993. PMID: 8490470 Free PMC article.
-
Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: further results. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer.Contraception. 1996 Sep;54(3 Suppl):1S-106S. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(15)30002-0. Contraception. 1996. PMID: 8899264 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinicopathological Features of Breast Cancer in Relation to Exposure of Cycling Reproductive Hormones: A Multicenter Retrospective Study of 14,731 Patients Diagnosed with Invasive Breast Cancer.Med Sci Monit. 2022 Nov 30;28:e938619. doi: 10.12659/MSM.938619. Med Sci Monit. 2022. PMID: 36447408 Free PMC article.
-
Reproductive factors, hormonal contraception, and risk of uterine leiomyomata in African-American women: a prospective study.Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Jan 15;159(2):113-23. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh016. Am J Epidemiol. 2004. PMID: 14718211 Free PMC article.
-
Oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk overall and by molecular subtype among young women.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 May;23(5):755-64. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0944. Epub 2014 Mar 14. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014. PMID: 24633144 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Oral Contraceptives as a Potential Risk Factor for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies Up to 2010.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 27;18(9):4638. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094638. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33925599 Free PMC article.
-
Oral contraceptive use and breast cancer: a prospective study of young women.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Oct;19(10):2496-502. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0747. Epub 2010 Aug 27. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010. PMID: 20802021 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Boonstra H, Duran V, Northington GV, Blumenthal P, Dominguez L, Pies C (2000) The ‘boom and bust phenomenon’: the hopes, dreams, and broken promises of the contraceptive revolution. Contraception 61: 9–25 - PubMed
-
- Breslow NE, Day NE (1980) The analysis of case–control studies. In Statistical Methods in Cancer Research – Volume 1, pp 5–338. IARC Scientific Publications - PubMed
-
- Brinton LA, Daling JR, Liff JM, Schoenberg JB, Malone KE, Stanford JL, Coates RJ, Gammon MD, Hanson L, Hoover RN (1995) Oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk among younger women. J Natl Cancer Inst 87: 827–835 - PubMed
-
- Brody SA, Turkes A, Goldzieher JW (1989) Pharmacokinetics of three bioequivalent norethindrone/mestranol-50 micrograms and three norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol-35 micrograms OC formulations: are ‘low-dose’ pills really lower? Contraception 40: 269–284 - PubMed
-
- Burkman RT (2001) Oral contraceptives: current status. Clin Obstet Gynecol 44: 62–72 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical