The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital
- PMID: 12558354
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00007
The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital
Abstract
Background: Studies of hospitalized patients identify safety as a significant problem, but few data are available regarding injuries occurring after discharge. Patients may be vulnerable during this transition period.
Objective: To describe the incidence, severity, preventability, and "ameliorability" of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital and to develop strategies for improving patient safety during this interval.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: A tertiary care academic hospital.
Patients: 400 consecutive patients discharged home from the general medical service.
Measurements: The three main outcomes were adverse events, defined as injuries occurring as a result of medical management; preventable adverse events, defined as adverse events judged to have been caused by an error; and ameliorable adverse events, defined as adverse events whose severity could have been decreased. Posthospital course was determined by performing a medical record review and a structured telephone interview approximately 3 weeks after each patient's discharge. Outcomes were determined by independent physician reviews.
Results: Seventy-six patients had adverse events after discharge (19% [95% CI, 15% to 23%]). Of these, 23 had preventable adverse events (6% [CI, 4% to 9%]) and 24 had ameliorable adverse events (6% [CI, 4% to 9%]). Three percent of injuries were serious laboratory abnormalities, 65% were symptoms, 30% were symptoms associated with a nonpermanent disability, and 3% were permanent disabilities. Adverse drug events were the most common type of adverse event (66% [CI, 55% to 76%]), followed by procedure-related injuries (17% [CI, 8% to 26%]). Of the 25 adverse events resulting in at least a nonpermanent disability, 12 were preventable (48% [CI, 28% to 68%]) and 6 were ameliorable (24% [CI, 7% to 41%]).
Conclusion: Adverse events occurred frequently in the peridischarge period, and many could potentially have been prevented or ameliorated with simple strategies.
Comment in
-
Summaries for patients. Adverse events after hospital discharge.Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 4;138(3):I-16. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00001. Ann Intern Med. 2003. PMID: 12558379 No abstract available.
-
Adverse events following discharge from the hospital.Ann Intern Med. 2004 Feb 3;140(3):231; author reply 232-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-3-200402030-00018. Ann Intern Med. 2004. PMID: 14757624 No abstract available.
-
Adverse events following discharge from the hospital.Ann Intern Med. 2004 Feb 3;140(3):231; author reply 232-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-3-200402030-00019. Ann Intern Med. 2004. PMID: 14757625 No abstract available.
-
Adverse events following discharge from the hospital.Ann Intern Med. 2004 Feb 3;140(3):231-2; author reply 232-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-3-200402030-00020. Ann Intern Med. 2004. PMID: 14757626 No abstract available.
-
Adverse events following discharge from the hospital.Ann Intern Med. 2004 Feb 3;140(3):232; author reply 232-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-3-200402030-00021. Ann Intern Med. 2004. PMID: 14757627 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical