Quality assurance in surgical oncology. Colorectal cancer as an example
- PMID: 12559084
- DOI: 10.1053/ejso.2002.1414
Quality assurance in surgical oncology. Colorectal cancer as an example
Abstract
Quality assurance in surgical oncology is a field of growing importance. National, regional and local systems have been built up in many countries. Often the quality assurance projects are linked to different registers. The advantage of such a link is the possibility of obtaining population-based data from unselected health care institutions. Few discussions of results from such projects have been published. Quality assurance of colorectal cancer surgery implies the development and use of systems for improvement all the way from detection of the cancer to the outcome as survival and patient satisfaction. To achieve this we must know what methods are being used and the outcome of our treatments. Designing processes for improvement necessitates careful planning, including decisions about end-points. Some crucial issues are discussed step-by-step in the present paper. In addition to auditing and providing collegial feedback, quality assurance is a tool for closing the gap between clinical practice and evidence based medicine and for creating new evidences as well as monitoring the introduction of new techniques and their effects.
Similar articles
-
[Quality assurance in colorectal cancer in Europe AD 2011].Zentralbl Chir. 2013 Dec;138(6):643-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1283795. Epub 2011 Dec 5. Zentralbl Chir. 2013. PMID: 22144139 Review. German.
-
The importance of quality assurance in surgical oncology in the treatment of colorectal cancer.Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2001 Oct;10(4):885-914, x. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2001. PMID: 11641097 Review.
-
The Dutch surgical colorectal audit.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;39(10):1063-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 Jul 18. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23871573
-
Quality assurance in the treatment of colorectal cancer: the EURECCA initiative.Ann Oncol. 2014 Aug;25(8):1485-92. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu039. Epub 2014 Mar 26. Ann Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24671742 Review.
-
Education is the key to quality of surgery for rectal cancer.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005 Aug;31(6):636-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.02.013. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16023945 Review.
Cited by
-
Volume of blood loss during surgery for colon cancer is a risk determinant for future small bowel obstruction caused by recurrence--a population-based epidemiological study.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Jul;400(5):599-607. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1317-8. Epub 2015 Jun 23. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015. PMID: 26100567
-
Risk factors for long-term pain after hernia surgery.Ann Surg. 2006 Aug;244(2):212-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000218081.53940.01. Ann Surg. 2006. PMID: 16858183 Free PMC article.
-
Advanced Hysteroscopic Surgery: Quality Assurance in Teaching Hospitals.JSLS. 2017 Apr-Jun;21(2):e2016.00107. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00107. JSLS. 2017. PMID: 28729781 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcome for stage II and III rectal and colon cancer equally good after treatment improvement over three decades.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jun;30(6):797-806. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2219-5. Epub 2015 Apr 29. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015. PMID: 25922143
-
Discordance between the patient's and surgeon's perception of complications following hernia surgery.Hernia. 2005 May;9(2):145-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-004-0310-x. Epub 2005 Feb 10. Hernia. 2005. PMID: 15703861
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous