Angioplasty vs thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative overview of the effects of interhospital transportation

Editorial

F Zijlstra. Eur Heart J. 2003 Jan.

. 2003 Jan;24(1):21-3.

doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00693-0.

No abstract available

Comment in

Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (PRAGUE-2 trial).
Perez de Arenaza D, Taneja AK, Flather M. Perez de Arenaza D, et al. Eur Heart J. 2003 Oct;24(19):1798. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.06.001. Eur Heart J. 2003. PMID: 14522580 No abstract available.
A critical amendment to the meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing thrombolysis with primary angioplasty.
Thimme M. Thimme M. Eur Heart J. 2003 Oct;24(20):1898; author reply 1898. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.06.006. Eur Heart J. 2003. PMID: 14563346 No abstract available.

Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial--PRAGUE-2.
Widimský P, Budesínský T, Vorác D, Groch L, Zelízko M, Aschermann M, Branny M, St'ásek J, Formánek P; 'PRAGUE' Study Group Investigators. Widimský P, et al. Eur Heart J. 2003 Jan;24(1):94-104. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00468-2. Eur Heart J. 2003. PMID: 12559941 Clinical Trial.