Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial--PRAGUE-2
- PMID: 12559941
- DOI: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00468-2
Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial--PRAGUE-2
Abstract
Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is shown to be the most effective reperfusion strategy in acute myocardial infarction. The aim of this multicentre national randomized mortality trial was to test whether the nationwide change in treatment guidelines (transportation of all patients to PCI centres) was warranted.
Methods: The PRAGUE-2 study randomized 850 patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction presenting within <12 h to the nearest community hospital without a catheter laboratory to either thrombolysis in this hospital (TL group, n=421) or immediate transport for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI group, n=429). The primary end-point was 30-day mortality. Secondary end-points were: death/reinfarction/stroke at 30 days (combined end-point) and 30-day mortality among patients treated within 0-3 h and 3-12 h after symptom onset. Maximum transport distance was 120 km.
Results: Five complications (1.2%) occurred during the transport. Randomization-balloon time in the PCI group was 97+/-27 min, and randomization-needle time in the TL group was 12+/-10 min. Mortality at 30 days was 10.0% in the TL group compared to 6.8% mortality in the PCI group (P=0.12, intention-to-treat analysis). Mortality of 380 patients who actually underwent PCI was 6.0% vs 10.4% mortality in 424 patients who finally received TL (P<0.05). Among 299 patients randomized >3 h after the onset of symptoms, the mortality of the TL group reached 15.3% compared to 6% in the PCI group (P<0.02). Patients randomized within <3 h of symptom onset (n=551) had no difference in mortality whether treated by TL (7.4%) or transferred to PCI (7.3%). A combined end-point occurred in 15.2% of the TL group vs 8.4% of the PCI group (P<0.003).
Conclusions: Long distance transport from a community hospital to a tertiary PCI centre in the acute phase of AMI is safe. This strategy markedly decreases mortality in patients presenting >3 h after symptom onset. For patients presenting within <3 h of symptoms, TL results are similar results to long distance transport for PCI.
Comment in
-
Angioplasty vs thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative overview of the effects of interhospital transportation.Eur Heart J. 2003 Jan;24(1):21-3. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00693-0. Eur Heart J. 2003. PMID: 12559934 No abstract available.
-
Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (PRAGUE-2 trial).Eur Heart J. 2003 Oct;24(19):1798. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.06.001. Eur Heart J. 2003. PMID: 14522580 No abstract available.
-
Transport for primary PCI in AMI: one-way or roundtrip journey?Eur Heart J. 2003 Nov;24(22):2071; author reply 2071-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.05.001. Eur Heart J. 2003. PMID: 14613746 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous