Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Feb;237(2):186-91.
doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000048454.11276.62.

How safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection?

Affiliations

How safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection?

Tarek A Emam et al. Ann Surg. 2003 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety of ultrasonic dissection.

Summary background data: High-power ultrasonic dissection is in widespread use for both open and laparoscopic operations and is generally perceived to carry a low risk of collateral damage, but there is no published evidence for this.

Methods: Under controlled experimental conditions, ultrasonic dissections were performed in pigs using Ultracision (Ethicon) or Autosonix (Tyco/USSC) at the three power settings (3, 4, and 5) in random fashion to mobilize the cardia and fundus, bile duct, hepatic artery, portal vein, aorta from the inferior vena cava, renal vessels, colon, and ureters. The dissections (open and laparoscopic) were carried out on pigs at each power setting with each device. Thermal mapping of the tissues during dissection was performed with an infrared thermal camera and associated software. The animals were killed at the end of each experiment and specimens were harvested for quantitative histology.

Results: Extreme and equivalent temperature gradients were generated by ultrasonic dissection with both systems. Heat production was directly proportional to the power setting and the activation time. The core body temperature of the animals after completion of the laparoscopic dissections rose by an average of 2.3 degrees C. The zone around the jaws that exceeded 60 degrees C with continuous ultrasonic dissection for 10 to 15 seconds at level 5 measured 25.3 and 25.7 mm for Ultracision and Autosonix, respectively. At this power setting and an activation time of 15 seconds, the temperature 1.0 cm away from the tips of the instrument exceeded 140 degrees C. Although there was no discernible macroscopic damage, these thermal changes were accompanied by significant histologic injury that extended to the media of large vessels and caused partial- to full-thickness mural damage of the cardia, ureter, and bile duct. Collateral damage was absent or insignificant after dissections at power level 3 with both systems and an activation time not exceeding 5 seconds.

Conclusions: High-power ultrasonic dissections at level 5 and to a lesser extent level 4 result in considerable heat production that causes proximity collateral damage to adjacent tissues when the continuous activation time exceeds 10 seconds. Ultrasonic dissections near important structures should be conducted at level 3. At power levels of 4 and 5, the ultrasonic energy bursts to the tissue should not exceed 5 seconds at any one time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1. Top: Thermal mapping during dissection with Ultracision at power setting 5 for 15 seconds: jaw temperature (A) = 224.3°C, tissue temperature at 10 mm from jaws (B) = 102°C, tissue temperature at 20 mm from jaws (C) = 99.8°C, tissue at 25 mm from jaws (D) = 69.8°C. Bottom: Thermal mapping during dissection with Autosonix at power setting 5 for 15 seconds: jaw temperature (A) = 199.9°C, tissue temperature at 11 mm from jaws (B) = 99.9°C, tissue temperature at 19 mm from jaws (C) = 105°C, instrument shaft temperature at 29 mm from tip (D) = 101°C.

References

    1. Amaral JF. Laparoscopic application of an ultrasonically activated scalpel. Gastrointest Clin North Am 1993; 3: 381–391.
    1. Humbly R, Hebda PA, Abell E, et al. Wound healing of skin incisions produced by the ultrasonically vibrating knife, scalpel, electrosurgery and carbon dioxide laser. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1988; 14: 11. - PubMed
    1. Kinoshita T, Kanehira E, Omura K, et al. Experimental study on heat production by a 23. 5-kHz ultrasonically activated device for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 621–625. - PubMed
    1. Kadesky KM, Schopf B, Blair GK. Proximity injury by the ultrasonically activated scalpel during dissection. J Paediatr Surg 1997; 32: 878–879. - PubMed
    1. Haag R, Cuschieri A. Recent advances in high-frequency electrosurgery: development of automated systems. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1993; 38: 354–364. - PubMed

Publication types