Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer
- PMID: 12562649
- DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdg069
Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a dose-dense primary chemotherapy on pathological response rate (pCR) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) treated with combined modality therapy.
Patients and methods: Stage IIIA/IIIB patients received three courses of induction chemotherapy (ICT) with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil (CEF) followed by local therapy (total mastectomy or segmental mastectomy with axillary nodes dissection) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) with three courses of CEF alternated with three courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Patients were randomized to receive ICT and ACT every 3 weeks (arm A, 'standard treatment') or every 2 weeks with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) support (arm B, 'dose-dense treatment'). In both arms radiotherapy was administered after the end of chemotherapy (in selected cases) and patients with hormonal receptor-positive tumors received tamoxifen for 5 years.
Results: A total of 150 patients were randomized (77 arm A and 73 arm B) and demographics were well balanced between the two arms. Compliance to treatment was excellent: 95% and 93% of patients in arms A and B, respectively, completed the treatment program with no modification or delay. Median duration of treatment (ICT+local+ACT) was 183 days (range 0-265) in arm A and 139 days (0-226) in arm B. The average relative dose intensity (ARDI) of chemotherapy was 1.3 with a 30% increase in the dose intensity in arm B in comparison with arm A. No difference in clinical [62%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 49% to 73.2%] and pathological response rates to ICT was observed between the two arms. Median follow-up was 5 years (range 1-96 months); median disease-free survivals were 4.8 years in arm A and 4.5 years in arm B. Median overall survival was 7.8 years in standard therapy: this figure has not yet been reached in the dose-dense treatment.
Conclusions: In LABC a dose-dense regimen, while allowing a 30% increase in the dose intensity of chemotherapy, did not provide significant improvement in pathological response rates. However, accelerated chemotherapy reduced the duration of the combined-modality program (6.1 versus 4.6 months) with no additional toxicities.
Similar articles
-
Accelerated-intensified cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) compared with standard CEF in metastatic breast cancer patients: results of a multicenter, randomized phase III study of the Italian Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ouest-Mammella Inter Gruppo Group.J Clin Oncol. 2001 Apr 15;19(8):2213-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.8.2213. J Clin Oncol. 2001. PMID: 11304774 Clinical Trial.
-
Accelerated versus standard epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or capecitabine as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the randomised UK TACT2 trial (CRUK/05/19): a multicentre, phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial.Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):929-945. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30404-7. Epub 2017 Jun 7. Lancet Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28600210 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Concurrent vs sequential adjuvant chemotherapy and hormone therapy in breast cancer: a multicenter randomized phase III trial.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Oct 19;103(20):1529-39. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr351. Epub 2011 Sep 15. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011. PMID: 21921285 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Final results of a randomized phase III trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with a dose-intensified epirubicin and cyclophosphamide + filgrastim as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer: an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK multicenter study.J Clin Oncol. 2003 Mar 1;21(5):843-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.05.135. J Clin Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12610183 Review.
-
Doxorubicin in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. FAC regimen, day 1, 21) versus methotrexate in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. CMF regimen, day 1, 21) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: a study by the GEICAM group.Ann Oncol. 2003 Jun;14(6):833-42. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg260. Ann Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12796019 Review.
Cited by
-
Dose-dense chemotherapy in nonmetastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Dec 15;102(24):1845-54. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq409. Epub 2010 Nov 23. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010. PMID: 21098761 Free PMC article.
-
Selection of breast cancer subtypes to improve benefits of intensive dose‑dense chemotherapy: A systematic meta‑analysis.Oncol Lett. 2023 Nov 7;27(1):4. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.14136. eCollection 2024 Jan. Oncol Lett. 2023. PMID: 38028182 Free PMC article.
-
Filling in the gaps: reporting of concurrent supportive care therapies in breast cancer chemotherapy trials.Support Care Cancer. 2011 Mar;19(3):315-22. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-1069-5. Epub 2011 Jan 4. Support Care Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21203780
-
Adjuvant Dose-Dense Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Available Evidence and Recent Updates.Breast Care (Basel). 2018 Dec;13(6):447-452. doi: 10.1159/000488026. Epub 2018 May 3. Breast Care (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30800040 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of pathological complete response as surrogate endpoint in neoadjuvant randomised clinical trials of early stage breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ. 2021 Dec 21;375:e066381. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066381. BMJ. 2021. PMID: 34933868 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical