Ambulatory epidural anesthesia and the duration of labor
- PMID: 12566183
- DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(02)00339-9
Ambulatory epidural anesthesia and the duration of labor
Abstract
Objectives: Ambulatory epidural analgesia has become a common option for women in labor in France. We tested the hypothesis that a method of epidural analgesia that allowed women to walk had specific advantages regarding mode of delivery, consumption of local anesthetic, oxytocin requirement, and labor duration.
Methods: Two hundred and twenty-one women with uncomplicated pregnancies who presented in spontaneous labor between 36 and 42 weeks of gestation or who were scheduled for induced labor were randomly divided into two groups, ambulatory and non-ambulatory. All were given intermittent epidural injections of 0.1% ropivacaine with 0.6 microg/ml sufentanil for analgesia during labor (P<0.05 was considered significant). None of the women had previous cesarean delivery.
Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in mode of delivery, consumption of local anesthetic, or oxytocin requirement. However, a significant difference was noted in labor duration (173.4+/-109.9 min vs. 236.4+/-130.6 min; P=0.001).
Conclusions: Walking with ambulatory labor analgesia shortens labor duration but has no other effect on the progress and outcome of labor.
Similar articles
-
[Efficacy and delivery outcomes of women underwent double-catheter epidural block during labor].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Nov;45(11):819-24. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2010. PMID: 21211279 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
Ropivacaine, 0.1%, plus sufentanil, 0.5 microg/ml, versus bupivacaine, 0.1%, plus sufentanil, 0.5 microg/ml, using patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor: a double-blind comparison.Anesthesiology. 2000 Jun;92(6):1588-93. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200006000-00015. Anesthesiology. 2000. PMID: 10839907 Clinical Trial.
-
Does epidural versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase the risk of instrumental and cesarean delivery in nulliparous women?J Clin Anesth. 2009 Mar;21(2):94-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.06.020. J Clin Anesth. 2009. PMID: 19329011
-
Failure to Extend Epidural Labor Analgesia for Cesarean Delivery Anesthesia: A Focused Review.Anesth Analg. 2016 Nov;123(5):1174-1180. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001437. Anesth Analg. 2016. PMID: 27529316 Review.
-
Does epidural anesthesia affect the course of labor and delivery?Semin Perinatol. 1991 Oct;15(5):358-67. Semin Perinatol. 1991. PMID: 1763342 Review.
Cited by
-
Maternal position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 9;11(11):CD008070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008070.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30411804 Free PMC article.
-
Regional anaesthesia in pre-eclampsia: advantages and disadvantages.Drugs. 2004;64(3):223-36. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464030-00001. Drugs. 2004. PMID: 14871167 Review.
-
Intrathecal opioids for combined spinal-epidural analgesia during labour.CNS Drugs. 2003;17(12):889-904. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200317120-00003. CNS Drugs. 2003. PMID: 12962528 Review.
-
Birthing positions and mother`s satisfaction with childbirth: a cross-sectional study on the relevance of self determination.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Mar;311(3):591-598. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07770-1. Epub 2024 Nov 4. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39495292 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003934. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003934.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 20;(8):CD003934. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003934.pub3. PMID: 19370591 Free PMC article. Updated.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical