Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses
- PMID: 12571303
- DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200302000-00012
Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses
Abstract
Background: Failure of total knee arthroplasty is problematic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors that influence the durability of a primary total knee prosthesis.
Methods: A survivorship analysis of 11,606 primary total knee arthroplasties carried out between January 1, 1978, and December 31, 2000, was performed. An analysis of patient and implant-related factors affecting survivorship was done with use of a multivariate Cox model.
Results: The survivorship was 91% (95% confidence interval, 90% to 91%) at ten years (2943 knees), 84% (95% confidence interval, 82% to 86%) at fifteen years (595 knees), and 78% (95% confidence interval, 74% to 81%) at twenty years (104 knees) following the surgery. Prosthetic survivorship at ten years was 83% for patients fifty-five years of age or less compared with 94% for those older than seventy years of age (p < 0.0001), 90% for those with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis compared with 95% for those with inflammatory arthritis (p < 0.005), and 91% for those with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament compared with 76% for those with substitution of the posterior cruciate ligament (a posterior stabilized prosthesis) (p < 0.0001). Survivorship at ten years was 92% for nonmodular metal-backed tibial components, 90% for modular metal-backed tibial components, and 97% for all-polyethylene tibial components (p < 0.0001). Survivorship at ten years was 92% for prostheses fixed with cement compared with 61% for those fixed without cement (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Significant risk factors for failure of total knee arthroplasty were the type of implant, age and gender of the patient, diagnosis, type of fixation, and design of the patellar component. In the ideal situation-treatment of a woman over the age of seventy years who has inflammatory arthritis with a nonmodular, metal-backed tibial component, cement fixation, an all-polyethylene patellar component, and retention of the posterior cruciate ligament-the ten-year survivorship of the prosthesis was estimated to be 98% (95% confidence interval, 97% to 99%).
Comment in
-
All-polyethylene compared with metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Aug;85(8):1615; author reply 1615-6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200308000-00037. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003. PMID: 12925650 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
All-Polyethylene Versus Metal-Backed Tibial Components-An Analysis of 27,733 Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacements from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jun 18;96(12):994-999. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00373. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014. PMID: 24951734
-
All-polyethylene compared with metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty at ten years. A prospective, randomized controlled trial.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jul;91(7):1587-94. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01427. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009. PMID: 19571080 Clinical Trial.
-
Modular fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament. A study of patients followed for a minimum of fifteen years.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Mar;87(3):598-603. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.00591. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005. PMID: 15741628
-
All-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Dec;33(8):3611-3622. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03594-y. Epub 2023 May 30. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023. PMID: 37249643 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Meta-Analysis Comparing All-Polyethylene Tibial Component to Metal-Backed Tibial Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Assessing Survivorship and Functional Outcomes.J Arthroplasty. 2016 Nov;31(11):2628-2636. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.035. Epub 2015 Aug 29. J Arthroplasty. 2016. PMID: 27538714 Review.
Cited by
-
Biomechanical analysis of patient specific cone vs conventional stem in revision total knee arthroplasty.J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jul 27;19(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04936-0. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 39068461 Free PMC article.
-
Introducing a knee endoprosthesis model increases risk of early revision surgery.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jun;470(6):1711-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2171-9. Epub 2011 Dec 9. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. PMID: 22161119 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and reliability of active robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Postgrad Med J. 2019 Mar;95(1121):125-133. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-136190. Epub 2019 Feb 26. Postgrad Med J. 2019. PMID: 30808721 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness and economic impact of the KineSpring ® Knee Implant System in the treatment for knee osteoarthritis.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Nov;21(11):2629-37. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2427-x. Epub 2013 Feb 10. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013. PMID: 23397420
-
Reoperations Following Cervical Disc Replacement.Asian Spine J. 2015 Jun;9(3):471-82. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.3.471. Epub 2015 Jun 8. Asian Spine J. 2015. PMID: 26097667 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical