Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions
- PMID: 12571344
- PMCID: PMC1743654
- DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.1.40
Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions
Abstract
To design potentially successful quality improvement (QI) interventions, it is crucial to make use of detailed breakdowns of the implementation processes of successful and unsuccessful interventions. Process evaluation can throw light on the mechanisms responsible for the result obtained in the intervention group. It enables researchers and implementers to (1). describe the intervention in detail, (2). check actual exposure to the intervention, and (3). describe the experience of those exposed. This paper presents a framework containing features of QI interventions that might influence success. Attention is paid to features of the target group, the implementers or change agents, the frequency of intervention activities, and features of the information imparted. The framework can be used as a starting point to address all three aspects of process evaluation mentioned above. Process evaluation can be applied to small scale improvement projects, controlled QI studies, and large scale QI programmes; in each case it plays a different role.
Similar articles
-
Adherence to guidelines on cervical cancer screening in general practice: programme elements of successful implementation.Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Nov;51(472):897-903. Br J Gen Pract. 2001. PMID: 11761203 Free PMC article.
-
The implementation of venous leg ulcer guidelines: process analysis of the intervention used in a multi-centre, pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial.J Clin Nurs. 2001 Nov;10(6):758-66. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00540.x. J Clin Nurs. 2001. PMID: 11822847 Clinical Trial.
-
Designing a quality improvement intervention: a systematic approach.Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Jun;12(3):215-20. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.3.215. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003. PMID: 12792013 Free PMC article.
-
A report card on quality improvement for children's health care.Pediatrics. 2001 Jan;107(1):143-55. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.1.143. Pediatrics. 2001. PMID: 11134448 Review.
-
What is adequate health care and how can quality of care be improved?Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 1998;11(2-3):58-64. doi: 10.1108/09526869810206080. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 1998. PMID: 10185317 Review.
Cited by
-
Multilevel impacts of a pediatric early warning system in resource-limited pediatric oncology hospitals.Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 12;12:1018224. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1018224. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36313665 Free PMC article.
-
Improving the implementation of perioperative safety guidelines using a multifaceted intervention approach: protocol of the IMPROVE study, a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.Implement Sci. 2015 Jan 8;10:3. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0198-5. Implement Sci. 2015. PMID: 25567584 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
An Integrated Process and Outcome Evaluation of a Web-Based Communication Tool for Patients With Malignant Lymphoma: Randomized Controlled Trial.J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 29;18(7):e206. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5877. J Med Internet Res. 2016. PMID: 27473173 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluating the CYP-IAPT transformation of child and adolescent mental health services in Cambridgeshire, UK: a qualitative implementation study.Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Oct 14;1:89. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00078-6. eCollection 2020. Implement Sci Commun. 2020. PMID: 33073242 Free PMC article.
-
Methods for evaluation of small scale quality improvement projects.Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Jun;12(3):210-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.3.210. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003. PMID: 12792012 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources