Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Feb;12(1):47-52.
doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.1.47.

Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies

Affiliations

Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies

M Eccles et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Feb.

Abstract

The methods of evaluating change and improvement strategies are not well described. The design and conduct of a range of experimental and non-experimental quantitative designs are considered. Such study designs should usually be used in a context where they build on appropriate theoretical, qualitative and modelling work, particularly in the development of appropriate interventions. A range of experimental designs are discussed including single and multiple arm randomised controlled trials and the use of more complex factorial and block designs. The impact of randomisation at both group and individual levels and three non-experimental designs (uncontrolled before and after, controlled before and after, and time series analysis) are also considered. The design chosen will reflect both the needs (and resources) in any particular circumstances and also the purpose of the evaluation. The general principle underlying the choice of evaluative design is, however, simple-those conducting such evaluations should use the most robust design possible to minimise bias and maximise generalisability.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lancet. 2001 May 5;357(9266):1406-9 - PubMed
    1. J Epidemiol Biostat. 2000;5(6):339-48 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):694-6 - PubMed
    1. Fam Pract. 2000 Apr;17(2):192-6 - PubMed
    1. Stat Med. 2002 Feb 15;21(3):397-405 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms