Effects of echo intensity on Doppler-shift compensation behavior in horseshoe bats
- PMID: 12574459
- DOI: 10.1152/jn.00246.2002
Effects of echo intensity on Doppler-shift compensation behavior in horseshoe bats
Abstract
Echolocating horseshoe bats respond to flight-speed induced shifts in echo frequency by adjusting the frequency of subsequent calls. Under natural conditions, Doppler effects may force the frequency of a returning echo several kilohertz above the original emission frequency. By lowering subsequent call frequencies, the bat can return echo frequencies to within a narrow spectral bandwidth to which its highly specialized auditory system is most sensitive. While Doppler-shift compensation (DSC) behavior specifically refers to frequency compensation, other parameters of the returning echo, such as delay, duration, and interaural time and intensity differences have been shown to influence DSC performance. Understanding the nature of these influences has already led to a better appreciation of the neurophysiology of DSC. Here we provide a quantitative analysis of the effects of a prominent feature of the returning echo, its intensity, on DSC performance in horseshoe bats. Although DSC performance generally tolerates echo attenuation up to approximately 40 dB relative to the outgoing emission intensity, a systematic decline in DSC performance can be observed over this range. Generally, the effects of echo attenuation are characterized by a reduction in 1) the overall amount of compensation relative to the size of the shift in echo frequency and 2) the rate at which the bat responds to perceived echo shifts. These effects appear to be the consequence of a systematic shift in the range of echo frequencies capable of inducing DSC behavior. In particular, the reference frequency (the minimum shift in echo frequency that will elicit DSC behavior) appears to be highly sensitive to echo intensity. Every 10-dB reduction in echo intensity shifts the reference upward nearly 250 Hz. Our results indicate that, even at the highest intensity levels, relatively minor changes in echo intensity critically influence frequency compensation during normal DSC. We conclude with a discussion of how these results might impact echolocation behavior of horseshoe bats under natural and experimental conditions.
Similar articles
-
Auditory-feedback control of temporal call patterns in echolocating horseshoe bats.J Neurophysiol. 2005 Mar;93(3):1295-303. doi: 10.1152/jn.00653.2004. Epub 2004 Oct 20. J Neurophysiol. 2005. PMID: 15496485
-
Doppler-shift compensation behavior in horseshoe bats revisited: auditory feedback controls both a decrease and an increase in call frequency.J Exp Biol. 2002 Jun;205(Pt 11):1607-16. doi: 10.1242/jeb.205.11.1607. J Exp Biol. 2002. PMID: 12000805
-
A possible neuronal basis for Doppler-shift compensation in echo-locating horseshoe bats.Nature. 1989 Oct 12;341(6242):529-32. doi: 10.1038/341529a0. Nature. 1989. PMID: 2797179
-
The evolution of echolocation in bats.Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Mar;21(3):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.001. Epub 2006 Feb 8. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006. PMID: 16701491 Review.
-
Auditory fovea and Doppler shift compensation: adaptations for flutter detection in echolocating bats using CF-FM signals.J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2011 May;197(5):541-59. doi: 10.1007/s00359-010-0569-6. Epub 2010 Sep 21. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2011. PMID: 20857119 Review.
Cited by
-
Echolocating bats can adjust sensory acquisition based on internal cues.BMC Biol. 2020 Nov 9;18(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-00904-2. BMC Biol. 2020. PMID: 33167988 Free PMC article.
-
Distress call-induced gene expression in the brain of the Indian short-nosed fruit bat, Cynopterus sphinx.J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2010 Feb;196(2):155-64. doi: 10.1007/s00359-009-0502-z. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2010. PMID: 20063102
-
Sensorimotor Model of Obstacle Avoidance in Echolocating Bats.PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Oct 26;11(10):e1004484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004484. eCollection 2015 Oct. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015. PMID: 26502063 Free PMC article.
-
A neural basis for auditory feedback control of vocal pitch.J Neurosci. 2003 Feb 15;23(4):1464-77. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-04-01464.2003. J Neurosci. 2003. PMID: 12598635 Free PMC article.
-
Sensory feedback control of mammalian vocalizations.Behav Brain Res. 2007 Sep 4;182(2):315-26. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.03.008. Epub 2007 Mar 14. Behav Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17449116 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous