Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2003 Feb;79(1):16-21.
doi: 10.1136/sti.79.1.16.

Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection. I: acceptability of urine testing in primary and secondary healthcare settings

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection. I: acceptability of urine testing in primary and secondary healthcare settings

J M Pimenta et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the acceptability of opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in young people in a range of healthcare settings.

Design: An opportunistic screening programme (1 September 1999 to 31 August 2000) using urine samples tested by ligase chain reaction (LCR). Data on uptake and testing were collected and in-depth interviews were used for programme evaluation.

Setting: General practice, family planning, genitourinary medicine clinics, adolescent sexual health clinics, termination of pregnancy clinics, and women's services in hospitals (antenatal, colposcopy, gynaecology and infertility clinics) in two health authorities (Wirral and Portsmouth and South East Hampshire). Main participants: Sexually active women aged between 16 and 24 years attending healthcare settings for any reason.

Main outcome measures: Uptake data: proportion of women accepting a test by area, healthcare setting, and age; overall population coverage achieved in 1 year. Evaluation data: participants' attitudes and views towards opportunistic screening and urine testing.

Results: Acceptance of testing by women (16-24 years) was 76% in Portsmouth and 84% in Wirral. Acceptance was lower in younger women (Portsmouth only) and varied by healthcare setting within each site. 50% of the target female population were screened in Portsmouth and 39% in Wirral. Both the opportunistic offer of screening and the method of screening were universally acceptable. Major factors influencing a decision to accept screening were the non-invasive nature of testing and treatment, desire to protect future fertility, and the experimental nature of the screening programme.

Conclusions: An opportunistic model of urine screening for chlamydial infection is a practical, universally acceptable method of screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Recent pilot studies of chlamydia screening.
    Stephenson J, Hopwood J, Babiker A, Copas A, Vickers M. Stephenson J, et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Aug;79(4):352. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.4.352-a. Sex Transm Infect. 2003. PMID: 12902608 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Sex Transm Dis. 1993 Jan-Feb;20(1):28-35 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1998 Jul 4;317(7150):26-7 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1999 Mar 20;318(7186):790-2 - PubMed
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Nov;49(448):923-4 - PubMed
    1. Int J STD AIDS. 1999 Dec;10(12):776-9 - PubMed

Publication types