The prevalence of ocular disease in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Abstract

Aim: Previous surveys of ocular disease in leukaemia patients have shown the retina, choroid, and orbit as the most commonly involved sites. Depending on the type of leukaemia and the study design, the prevalence of ocular disease in leukaemia varies from 30 to 90%. Although chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is the most common leukaemia in Western countries, the prevalence of ocular disease in CLL is not known. The aim of this prospective study was to estimate the prevalence of ocular disease in CLL.

Patients and methods: All CLL patients attending either a teaching or district general hospital haematology clinic were invited to undergo a full eye examination. The clinical stage of the CLL (Binet) at the time of the eye examination and the most recent full blood count (FBC) indices were recorded for each patient.

Results: Over 6 months, 25 patients with an average age of 65 were recruited. A total of 18 patients had Binet stage A disease, three had stage B, and four stage C. The mean FBC indices at the time of examination were haemoglobin 13.5 g/dl, white cell count 37.4 x 10(9)/l, and platelets 172 x 10(9)/l. Only three patients (12%) had ocular disease that was likely to be a secondary complication of CLL. These secondary complications included bilateral posterior subcapsular cataract following radiotherapy, unilateral acute retinal necrosis, and unilateral conjunctival vascular anomalies. The presence of ocular complications was not related to the CLL stage or to the current FBC parameters.

Discussion: This study demonstrates that ocular involvement in CLL is uncommon, a reflection of the indolent course of CLL as compared to other leukaemias. Although sight-threatening ocular complications have been documented in this and other studies, the low prevalence of complications and the lack of association with disease parameters make it impossible to identify a 'high-risk' group. Routine screening of CLL patients for ocular complications is not justified.