Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Winter;15(4):407-14.
doi: 10.1089/08942680260473489.

Effects on lung function, symptoms, and bronchial hyperreactivity of low-dose inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate given with HFA-134a or CFC propellant

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effects on lung function, symptoms, and bronchial hyperreactivity of low-dose inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate given with HFA-134a or CFC propellant

A Woodcock et al. J Aerosol Med. 2002 Winter.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of BDP 200 microg bid via metered dose inhaler, using HFA-134a (Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy) versus CFC (Becotide, Allen & Hanburys, U.K.) as a propellant. 172 adult patients (86 in each group) with stable mild persistent asthma who completed a 7-day run-in period were randomized to receive a 6-week treatment in a double-blind, double dummy, parallel-group design; 164 patients completed the study. Morning and evening PEFR, use of rescue salbutamol, number of day-time and night-time asthma attacks, number of night-time awakenings and clinical symptoms were recorded daily on a diary card. Pulmonary function tests (FEV(1), FVC, PEFR, and MEF(50)) were measured at the clinic before and after the 1-week run-in period, and after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment. A challenge test with inhaled methacholine was completed at baseline and at the end of the treatment period to assess potential bronchial hyper-reactivity in a subgroup of subjects (n = 65; 34 HFA, 31 CFC). In accordance with asthma of mild severity (FEV(1) predicted over 90% in both groups), a small improvement in lung function compared to baseline was seen for both treatments, significantly for FEV(1) in BDP HFA and MEF(50) in both groups. The two formulations of BDP had similar efficacy for the primary outcome variable morning PEFR (ITT population mean difference 5.8 L/min; C.I. -4.9 to +16.5) as well as for the secondary outcomes of evening PEFR and clinic FEV(1). There were small improvements in methacholine PD(20) and PC20 in both groups, with no significant difference between treatments. A total of 22 and 19 drug-related adverse events were reported in the BDP HFA and CFC groups, respectively; most events were of seasonal nature or were local effects due to the use of inhaled corticosteroids. It can be concluded that the newly developed formulation of BDP given via HFA-134a seems to provide similar asthma control, compared with the same low daily dose of the active drug delivered via CFC. Further studies are needed using higher doses in moderate to severe asthma to confirm these preliminary findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms