Is the cerebellum a smith predictor?
- PMID: 12581990
- DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1993.9942050
Is the cerebellum a smith predictor?
Abstract
The motor system may use internal predictive models of the motor apparatus to achieve better control than would be possible by negative feedback. Several theories have proposed that the cerebellum may form these predictive representations. In this article, we review these theories and try to unify them by reference to an engineering control model known as a Smith Predictor. We suggest that the cerebellum forms two types of internal model. One model is a forward predictive model of the motor apparatus (e.g., limb and muscle), providing a rapid prediction of the sensory consequences of each movement. The second model is of the time delays in the control loop (due to receptor and effector delays, axonal conductances, and cognitive processing delays). This model delays a copy of the rapid prediction so that it can be compared in temporal register with actual sensory feedback from the movement. The result of this comparison is used both to correct for errors in performance and as a training signal to learn the first model. We discuss evidence that the cerebellum could form both of these models and suggest that the cerebellum may hold at least two separate Smith Predictors. One, in the lateral cerebellum, would predict the movement outcome in visual, egocentric, or peripersonal coordinates. Another, in the intermediate cerebellum, would predict the consequences in motor coordinates. Generalization of the Smith Predictor theory is discussed in light of cerebellar involvement in nonmotor control systems, including autonomic functions and cognition.
Similar articles
-
Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching.J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jul;98(1):54-62. doi: 10.1152/jn.00266.2007. Epub 2007 May 16. J Neurophysiol. 2007. PMID: 17507504
-
The cerebellum and the timing of coordinated eye and hand tracking.Brain Cogn. 2002 Feb;48(1):212-26. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1314. Brain Cogn. 2002. PMID: 11812043
-
Cognitive and motor loops of the human cerebro-cerebellar system.J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Nov;22(11):2663-76. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21382. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010. PMID: 19925191
-
Visual awareness and the cerebellum: possible role of decorrelation control.Prog Brain Res. 2004;144:61-75. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(03)14404-4. Prog Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 14650840 Review.
-
Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control.Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Dec;16(6):645-9. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.08.016. Epub 2006 Oct 30. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006. PMID: 17071073 Review.
Cited by
-
Control of position and movement is simplified by combined muscle spindle and Golgi tendon organ feedback.J Neurophysiol. 2013 Feb;109(4):1126-39. doi: 10.1152/jn.00751.2012. Epub 2012 Oct 24. J Neurophysiol. 2013. PMID: 23100138 Free PMC article.
-
To lead and to lag - forward and backward recalibration of perceived visuo-motor simultaneity.Front Psychol. 2013 Jan 22;3:599. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00599. eCollection 2012. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23346063 Free PMC article.
-
Developmentally unique cerebellar processing prioritizes self-over other-generated movements.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Mar 30:2023.12.16.571990. doi: 10.1101/2023.12.16.571990. bioRxiv. 2024. Update in: J Neurosci. 2024 May 8;44(19):e2345232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2345-23.2024. PMID: 38168365 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Cerebellar patients have intact feedback control that can be leveraged to improve reaching.Elife. 2020 Oct 7;9:e53246. doi: 10.7554/eLife.53246. Elife. 2020. PMID: 33025903 Free PMC article.
-
Sleep, plasticity, and sensory neurodevelopment.Neuron. 2022 Oct 19;110(20):3230-3242. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.08.005. Epub 2022 Sep 8. Neuron. 2022. PMID: 36084653 Free PMC article. Review.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources