Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2003 Feb 15;326(7385):373.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7385.373.

Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data

Donald J Willison et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To assess patients' preferred method of consent for the use of information from electronic medical records for research.

Design: Interviews and a structured survey of patients in practices with electronic medical records.

Setting: Family practices in southern Ontario, Canada.

Participants: 123 patients: 17 were interviewed and 106 completed a survey.

Main outcome measures: Patients' opinions and concerns on use of information from their medical records for research and their preferences for method of consent.

Results: Most interviewees were willing to allow the use of their information for research purposes, although the majority preferred that consent was sought first. The seeking of consent was considered an important element of respect for the individual. Most interviewees made little distinction between identifiable and anonymised data. Research sponsored by private insurance firms generated the greatest concern, and research sponsored by foundation the least. Sponsorship by drug companies evoked negative responses during interview and positive responses in the survey.

Conclusions: Patients are willing to allow information from their medical records to be used for research, but most prefer to be asked for consent either verbally or in writing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Level of concern over sources of funding for research

Comment in

References

    1. Woodward B. Challenges to human subject protections in US medical research. JAMA. 1999;282:1947–1952. - PubMed
    1. Mitchell E, Sullivan F. A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97. BMJ. 2001;322:279–282. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anon. Canadians and the confidentiality of their personal health information. Toronto: Angus Reid Group; 1999.
    1. Policy and Planning Division Saskatchewan Health. Consultation paper on protection of personal health information, 1998. www.health.gov.sk.ca/ph_br_health_leg_phiq/default.htm (accessed 18 Dec 2002).
    1. Morgan R. Privacy and the community. Sydney, NSW: Office of the Federal Privacy Commissioner; 2001.

Publication types