Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002 Dec;37(4):781-93.
doi: 10.1016/s0029-6465(02)00025-7.

Technology in the birthing room

Affiliations
Review

Technology in the birthing room

Susan R Miesnik et al. Nurs Clin North Am. 2002 Dec.

Abstract

The use of technology is not benign. As with any health care intervention, there are associated risks and benefits. The practitioner needs to constantly consider the benefits of the technology versus the naturalistic birth experience. The use of technology should optimize birth outcomes while maintaining a balance that provides for the best possible human birth experience. Technology, however, does have merit in the birth setting, regardless of location, but its use should be evaluated on an individual, as needed, basis. The most common technological advances currently available for assessment and maternal/fetal care during birth include electronic fetal monitoring, ultrasonography, blood pressure screening, maternal/fetal pulse oximetry, and infusion pumps. All obstetrical care providers must be familiar with the forms of technology currently available and be aware of emerging technologies for use during the birthing process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • Improving the birthing environment (Part 1).
    Haines A, Kimber L. Haines A, et al. Pract Midwife. 2005 Jan;8(1):18-20. Pract Midwife. 2005. PMID: 15690880 Review. No abstract available.
  • Is there logic behind fetal monitoring?
    Priddy KD. Priddy KD. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004 Sep-Oct;33(5):550-3. doi: 10.1177/0884217504268942. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004. PMID: 15495699 Review.
  • Fetal health surveillance in labour.
    Liston R, Crane J, Hamilton E, Hughes O, Kuling S, MacKinnon C, McNamara H, Milne K, Richardson B, Trépanie MJ; Working Group on Fetal Health Surveillance in Labor, Executive and Council, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Committee, Clinical Practice Guidline Committee, and ALARM Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Canada; Canadian Medical Protection Association. Liston R, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002 Mar;24(3):250-76; quiz 277-80. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002. PMID: 12196876 English, French.
  • Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.
    Kotaska A, Menticoglou S, Gagnon R; MATERNAL FETAL MEDICINE COMMITTEE. Kotaska A, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Jun;31(6):557-566. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34221-9. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009. PMID: 19646324 English, French.
  • Use of technology in childbirth. 4. Electronic fetal monitoring.
    Brodrick A. Brodrick A. Pract Midwife. 2012 Jan;15(1):39-40, 42-3. Pract Midwife. 2012. PMID: 22324134 No abstract available.