A comparative study of microleakage below cemento-enamel junction using light cure and chemically cured glass ionomer cement liners
- PMID: 12587752
A comparative study of microleakage below cemento-enamel junction using light cure and chemically cured glass ionomer cement liners
Abstract
Posterior composite resins have gained considerable importance over last few years. However, improper placement techniques continue to be a prime cause of failure of these restorations. This study was done to compare the microleakage at the tooth restoration interface extending below cementoenamel junction when posterior composite restorations were placed directly in the cavity or when placed over a glass ionomer cement liner, both chemically cured and light cured. The results have shown that light cured glass ionomer when used as a liner under a composite restoration used below gingival cementum/dentin margin has the best sealing capability.
Similar articles
-
Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques.Oper Dent. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):60-9. Oper Dent. 2001. PMID: 11203779 Clinical Trial.
-
Microleakage of Class II composite restorations.Am J Dent. 2001 Jun;14(3):177-85. Am J Dent. 2001. PMID: 11572297 Clinical Trial.
-
Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.Oper Dent. 2006 May-Jun;31(3):377-83. doi: 10.2341/05-49. Oper Dent. 2006. PMID: 16802647
-
Glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cement restorations.Curr Opin Dent. 1992 Mar;2:137-41. Curr Opin Dent. 1992. PMID: 1520925 Review.
-
Glass ionomers revisited.Dent Today. 2001 Jan;20(1):36-8, 40-3. Dent Today. 2001. PMID: 12524885 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Effect of acid etching of glass ionomer cement surface on the microleakage of sandwich restorations.J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Jun;15(3):230-4. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000300014. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007. PMID: 19089135 Free PMC article.