Clinical guidelines versus clinical practice in the management of low back pain
- PMID: 12587934
Clinical guidelines versus clinical practice in the management of low back pain
Abstract
To date, there have been limited data on the implementation of evidenced-based clinical guidelines for low back pain (LBP). The aim of this study was to assess current management of LBP and evaluate to what extent clinical practice now reflects clinical guidelines. This survey involved the collection and analysis of data from the records of 200 patients who had been referred to a large teaching hospital with LBP Analysis indicated a high use of X-rays, with little evidence of initial biopsychosocial assessment. The most popular treatments were advice, active exercises and McKenzie therapy. Manipulation was rarely used. Overall, a low use of electrotherapy was recorded. The results emphasise how little the clinical guidelines have influenced the decisions of clinicians, and highlight the need to address the barriers to adopting an evidence-based approach in this area.
Similar articles
-
Physiotherapy for low back pain: differences between public and private healthcare sectors in Ireland--a retrospective survey.Man Ther. 2008 Oct;13(5):441-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2007.05.017. Epub 2007 Aug 1. Man Ther. 2008. PMID: 17683968
-
A Delphi study investigating consensus among expert physiotherapists in relation to the management of low back pain.Musculoskeletal Care. 2008 Dec;6(4):197-210. doi: 10.1002/msc.126. Musculoskeletal Care. 2008. PMID: 18311847
-
Physical therapy management of low back pain: an exploratory survey of therapist approaches.Phys Ther. 2001 Apr;81(4):1018-28. Phys Ther. 2001. PMID: 11276184
-
Chiropractic management of low back pain and low back-related leg complaints: a literature synthesis.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Nov-Dec;31(9):659-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.10.007. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008. PMID: 19028250 Review.
-
Inconsistent grading of evidence across countries: a review of low back pain guidelines.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Sep;29(7):576-81, 581.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.07.005. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006. PMID: 16949948 Review.
Cited by
-
Non-specific low back pain in primary care in the Spanish National Health Service: a prospective study on clinical outcomes and determinants of management.BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 May 17;6:57. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-57. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006. PMID: 16707005 Free PMC article.
-
A critical review of guidelines for low back pain treatment.Eur Spine J. 2006 May;15(5):543-53. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1027-y. Epub 2005 Oct 11. Eur Spine J. 2006. PMID: 16217664 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostics, incidence and treatment of the distal radius fractures: an area for many studies, opinions and treatment options.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Dec;48(6):4315-4317. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02150-3. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022. PMID: 36450839 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Do physical therapists follow evidence-based guidelines when managing musculoskeletal conditions? Systematic review.BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e032329. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032329. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31591090 Free PMC article.
-
Consumers' experiences of back pain in rural Western Australia: access to information and services, and self-management behaviours.BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Oct 11;12:357. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-357. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012. PMID: 23057669 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous