Cytologic criteria for well differentiated adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens
- PMID: 12589645
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11012
Cytologic criteria for well differentiated adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens
Abstract
Background: Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of pancreatic lesions has become popular to establish a tissue diagnosis before chemotherapy and/or surgery. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of FNAB have improved as a result of several articles regarding cytologic criteria for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, false-negative and "suspicious for malignancy" rates remain relatively high, in part because of the underdiagnosis of well differentiated adenocarcinoma (WDA). Existing cytologic criteria do not specifically focus on WDA. In this study, the authors attempt to add to, redefine, and test cytologic criteria for WDA of the pancreas in FNAB specimens.
Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed the specimens of 291 consecutive computed tomography-guided FNABs of pancreatic lesions performed at the study institution between 1995 and 1999. The original cytologic diagnoses were confirmed by cell blocks (131), surgical tissue (84), or clinical follow-up. The FNAB specimens were evaluated for the presence of 10 cytologic criteria: 1) anisonucleosis, 2) nuclear membrane irregularity, 3) nuclear crowding/overlapping/three-dimensionality, 4) nuclear enlargement (if there are more than two red blood cells), 5) gap versus confluent cell spacing, 6) hyperchromasia, 7) macronucleoli, 8) mitosis, 9) chromatin clearing, and 10) necrosis.
Results: The original cytologic diagnoses were nondiagnostic in 24 cases, benign in 27, suspicious for malignancy in 15, and malignant in 225. Among the 225 malignant lesions, 74 cases were diagnosed as WDA. Cytologic criteria 1-4 were observed in 92-99% of WDA cases, whereas criteria 5-10 were present in only 7-38% of WDA cases. Six of 15 suspicious and 4 of 27 negative cases were of low cellularity but retrospectively met the cytologic criteria 1-4 for WDA (the diagnosis was confirmed on clinical follow-up).
Conclusions: The diagnosis of pancreatic WDA can be made in FNAB specimens by the observance of anisonucleosis, nuclear membrane irregularity, nuclear crowding/overlapping/three-dimensionality, and nuclear enlargement. Necrosis, chromatin clearing, mitosis, macronucleoli, and hyperchromasia are of limited diagnostic significance because they are commonly absent in pancreatic WDA.
Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.
Similar articles
-
Cytologic features and diagnostic pitfalls of primary ampullary tumors by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.Cancer. 2005 Oct 25;105(5):289-97. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21306. Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15986397
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in 179 cases: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.Cancer. 2002 Jun 25;96(3):174-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10614. Cancer. 2002. PMID: 12115306
-
Fine needle aspiration of the pancreas. In quest of accuracy.Acta Cytol. 1995 Jan-Feb;39(1):1-10. Acta Cytol. 1995. PMID: 7846994
-
Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in pancreatic lesions. A review of 77 cases.Acta Cytol. 1993 Nov-Dec;37(6):889-93. Acta Cytol. 1993. PMID: 8249508 Review.
-
Fine needle aspiration cytology of the pancreas.Acta Cytol. 1989 Mar-Apr;33(2):145-52. Acta Cytol. 1989. PMID: 2538983 Review.
Cited by
-
Small and potentially resectable focal pancreatic lesions noted on CT/MRI scans in nonjaundiced patients: likelihood of neoplasia and utility of EUS.J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Apr;16(4):793-800. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1812-3. Epub 2012 Jan 19. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012. PMID: 22258870
-
Endosonographers performing on-site evaluation of solid pancreatic specimens for EUS-guided biopsy: A formal training method and learning curves.Endosc Ultrasound. 2021 Nov-Dec;10(6):463-471. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-21-00088. Endosc Ultrasound. 2021. PMID: 34975043 Free PMC article.
-
Martian Popping Thing.J Cytol. 2018 Jan-Mar;35(1):53-54. doi: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_238_16. J Cytol. 2018. PMID: 29403172 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Photon-tissue interaction model enables quantitative optical analysis of human pancreatic tissues.Opt Express. 2010 Oct 11;18(21):21612-21. doi: 10.1364/OE.18.021612. Opt Express. 2010. PMID: 20941059 Free PMC article.
-
My approach to pancreatic fine needle aspiration.J Clin Pathol. 2007 Jan;60(1):43-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2005.034959. Epub 2006 May 12. J Clin Pathol. 2007. PMID: 16698956 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous