Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Feb;213(1):28-34.
doi: 10.1007/s00427-002-0290-8. Epub 2002 Dec 13.

Parallel microtubules and other conserved elements of dorsal axial specification in the direct developing frog, Eleutherodactylus coqui

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Parallel microtubules and other conserved elements of dorsal axial specification in the direct developing frog, Eleutherodactylus coqui

Richard P Elinson et al. Dev Genes Evol. 2003 Feb.

Abstract

Specification of the dorsal axis in commonly studied frogs, such as Xenopus laevis and Rana pipiens, depends on a microtubule-mediated movement of cytoplasm in the fertilized egg. The Puerto Rican tree frog, Eleutherodactylus coqui, has an egg that is twenty times the volume of that of X. laevis, raising the question as to whether the mechanism of dorsal axial specification is conserved in these large eggs. Fertilized eggs of E. coqui develop a transient array of parallel microtubules, similar to other frogs, but proportionately larger. The array persists after first cleavage, longer than in other frogs, and is gone by the third cleavage. Correlated with the longer life of the parallel microtubules, both 2- and 8-cell E. coqui embryos remain sensitive to gravity-mediated axial specification, a sensitivity lost in X. laevis before the 2-cell stage. Activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway by injected Xwnt8 RNA causes axial formation as in X. laevis. The results indicate that elements of dorsal axial specification are conserved in E. coqui, but they occur later compared to in X. laevis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Cell Sci. 1998 Feb;111 ( Pt 3):385-93 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1981 Aug 6;292(5823):511-6 - PubMed
    1. Cell. 1998 Jun 12;93(6):1031-41 - PubMed
    1. Cell. 1994 Dec 2;79(5):791-803 - PubMed
    1. J Cell Biol. 1999 Jul 26;146(2):427-37 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources