Current perspectives on HER2 testing: a review of national testing guidelines
- PMID: 12591971
- DOI: 10.1097/01.MP.0000052102.90815.82
Current perspectives on HER2 testing: a review of national testing guidelines
Abstract
Knowledge of HER2 status is a prerequisite when considering a patient's eligibility for Herceptin (trastuzumab) therapy. Accurate assessment of HER2 status is essential to ensure that all patients who may benefit from Herceptin are correctly identified. There are several assays available to determine HER2 status: the most common in routine clinical practice are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Various factors can affect the results achieved with these assays, including the assay antibody/probe, the methodology and the experience of personnel. Many countries have implemented national testing guidelines in an attempt to standardize testing procedures and make results more accurate. These guidelines vary in the level of detail and the number of recommendations. This review looks at areas of consensus between the different national testing guidelines and highlights where errors may arise during the testing procedure. The key point underlined by this review is that whatever method is used to test for HER2 status, the technology must be validated first, and there must be regular internal and external quality control and quality assurance procedures.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of the HER2 status in breast cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization: a technical review with interpretive guidelines.Hum Pathol. 2005 Mar;36(3):250-61. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2004.11.010. Hum Pathol. 2005. PMID: 15791569 Review.
-
[Assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer].Bull Cancer. 2004 Dec 1;91 Suppl 4:S211-5. Bull Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15899610 Review. French.
-
HER2 testing in breast cancer: NCCN Task Force report and recommendations.J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2006 Jul;4 Suppl 3:S1-22; quiz S23-4. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2006. PMID: 16813731 Review.
-
Testing for HER2 in breast cancer.Histopathology. 2004 Sep;45(3):207-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01903.x. Histopathology. 2004. PMID: 15330798 Review.
-
Genetic heterogeneity in HER2 testing may influence therapy eligibility.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 May;133(1):161-8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1744-3. Epub 2011 Sep 8. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012. PMID: 21901388
Cited by
-
Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.PLoS Med. 2012;9(5):e1001216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001216. Epub 2012 May 29. PLoS Med. 2012. PMID: 22675273 Free PMC article.
-
HER2 evaluation using the novel rabbit monoclonal antibody SP3 and CISH in tissue microarrays of invasive breast carcinomas.J Clin Pathol. 2007 Sep;60(9):1001-5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2006.040287. Epub 2006 Dec 8. J Clin Pathol. 2007. PMID: 17158643 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of chromogenic in situ hybridisation with fluorescence in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry for the assessment of her-2/neu oncogene in archival material of breast carcinoma.Acta Histochem Cytochem. 2008 Jun 27;41(3):59-64. doi: 10.1267/ahc.07029. Acta Histochem Cytochem. 2008. PMID: 18636112 Free PMC article.
-
[Molecular protocol for HER2/neu analysis in breast carcinoma].Clin Transl Oncol. 2005 Dec;7(11):504-11. doi: 10.1007/BF02717004. Clin Transl Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16373062 Spanish.
-
Correlation of Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization for HER-2 Assessment in Breast Cancer Patients: Single Centre Experience.Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Mar 23;6(4):593-599. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.124. eCollection 2018 Apr 15. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 29731922 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous