Comparison of endothelial cell count using confocal and contact specular microscopy
- PMID: 12592045
- DOI: 10.1159/000068562
Comparison of endothelial cell count using confocal and contact specular microscopy
Abstract
Precise examination of the corneal endothelium has become increasingly important due to the growing number of intraocular and corneal procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare prospectively the corneal endothelial cell count in normal eyes obtained by confocal and specular microscopy. Central corneal endothelial cell densities of 42 eyes from 42 patients were measured by confocal and contact specular microscopy. Endothelial cells were analyzed with the same software in a manual, an automated and a semi-automated mode. The mean endothelial cell density obtained by confocal microscopy was (in the manual, automated and semi-automated modes) 3,069 +/- 285, 2,791 +/- 344 and 3,077 +/- 286 cells/mm(2), and obtained by specular microscopy 3,076 +/- 298, 2,796 +/- 271 and 3,082 +/- 282 cells/m(2), respectively. No statistically significant difference of endothelial cell density between confocal and specular microscopy was found. Endothelial cell count was significantly lower in the automated than in the semi-automated and manual analysis both with confocal and with specular microscopy. In conclusion, endothelial cell count measurements with confocal and contact specular microscopy are comparable.
Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Noncontact Specular and Confocal Microscopy for Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium.Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Sep;44 Suppl 1:S144-S150. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000362. Eye Contact Lens. 2018. PMID: 28346276
-
Comparison of manual & automated analysis methods for corneal endothelial cell density measurements by specular microscopy.J Optom. 2018 Jul-Sep;11(3):182-191. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Aug 7. J Optom. 2018. PMID: 28797649 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of semi-automated center-dot and fully automated endothelial cell analyses from specular microscopy images.Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;38(6):2495-2507. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0760-7. Epub 2017 Oct 30. Int Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29086325
-
[Specular microscopy and clinical correlations].Oftalmologia. 2011;55(3):22-9. Oftalmologia. 2011. PMID: 22428289 Review. Romanian.
-
Assessment of corneal endothelial cell parameters using specular microscopy in previously infected SARS-CoV-2 patients.Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug;43(8):2983-2987. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02681-7. Epub 2023 Mar 11. Int Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 36906646 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in Phramongkutklao Hospital.Clin Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;2(1):147-51. Clin Ophthalmol. 2008. PMID: 19668398 Free PMC article.
-
Diabetic Retinopathy: Soluble and Imaging Ocular Biomarkers.J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 24;12(3):912. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030912. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36769560 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fully automatic evaluation of the corneal endothelium from in vivo confocal microscopy.BMC Med Imaging. 2015 Apr 26;15:13. doi: 10.1186/s12880-015-0054-3. BMC Med Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25928199 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of automated vs manual analysis of corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in normal and corneal endothelial dystrophy-affected dogs.Vet Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;23(1):44-51. doi: 10.1111/vop.12682. Epub 2019 Jun 9. Vet Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 31179615 Free PMC article.
-
Corneal endothelial cell loss after trabeculectomy or after phacoemulsification, IOL implantation and trabeculectomy in 1 or 2 steps.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Feb;248(2):249-56. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1185-4. Epub 2009 Oct 16. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010. PMID: 19834730
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources