Superlatent inhibition and spontaneous recovery: differential effects of pre- and postconditioning CS-alone presentations after long delays in different contexts
- PMID: 12593329
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03195962
Superlatent inhibition and spontaneous recovery: differential effects of pre- and postconditioning CS-alone presentations after long delays in different contexts
Abstract
In two pairs of three-stage conditioned taste aversion experiments, we examined the effects of delay interval (1 or 21 days) between the second and third stages, and of context in which the animals spent the delay (same as or different from the context of the other stages) on latent inhibition (LI) and spontaneous recovery following extinction. In the LI experiments (Experiments 1A and 1B), the first stage comprised nonreinforced presentations to saccharin or to water. In the second stage, rats were conditioned by saccharin paired with LiCl. In the extinction experiments (Experiments 2A and 2B), the order of the stages was reversed. For all experiments, Stage 3, the test stage, consisted of three presentations of saccharin alone. There was a super-LI effect in the saccharin-preexposed group that spent the 21-day delay in the different context (Experiment 1A). When the delay was spent in the same context, there was no difference in the amount of LI between the short- and long-delay groups (Experiment 1B). Conversely, there was a spontaneous recovery effect in the long-delay/same-context group (Experiment 2B), but not in the long-delay/different-context group (Experiment 2A). The pattern of results, incompatible with current explanations of delay-induced changes in memory performance, was interpreted in terms of an interaction between the delay conditions (same or different delay context), which modulate the extinction of previously acquired context-CS-nothing associations (during CS-alone presentations), and primacy effects.
Similar articles
-
There is a time and a place for everything: bidirectional modulations of latent inhibition by time-induced context differentiation.Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):806-21. doi: 10.3758/bf03196774. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005. PMID: 16523999 Review.
-
Latent inhibition of conditioned disgust reactions in rats.Learn Behav. 2010 May;38(2):177-86. doi: 10.3758/LB.38.2.177. Learn Behav. 2010. PMID: 20400737
-
Delay-induced super-latent inhibition as a function of order of exposure to two flavours prior to compound conditioning.Q J Exp Psychol B. 2005 Jan;58(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/02724990444000014. Q J Exp Psychol B. 2005. PMID: 15844374
-
Latent inhibition and conditioning in rat strains which show differential prepulse inhibition.Behav Genet. 2001 May;31(3):325-33. doi: 10.1023/a:1012287527438. Behav Genet. 2001. PMID: 11699605
-
Latent inhibition in conditioned taste aversion: the roles of stimulus frequency and duration and the amount of fluid ingested during preexposure.Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1995 Sep;64(2):125-32. doi: 10.1006/nlme.1995.1051. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1995. PMID: 7582820
Cited by
-
Sensory-specific associations in flavor-preference reversal learning.Learn Behav. 2009 May;37(2):179-87. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.2.179. Learn Behav. 2009. PMID: 19380895
-
A limited role for mediodorsal thalamus in devaluation tasks.Behav Neurosci. 2008 Jun;122(3):659-76. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.122.3.659. Behav Neurosci. 2008. PMID: 18513136 Free PMC article.
-
There is a time and a place for everything: bidirectional modulations of latent inhibition by time-induced context differentiation.Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):806-21. doi: 10.3758/bf03196774. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005. PMID: 16523999 Review.
-
Trial order and retention interval in human predictive judgment.Mem Cognit. 2005 Dec;33(8):1368-76. doi: 10.3758/bf03193369. Mem Cognit. 2005. PMID: 16615384
-
Spontaneous recovery of excitation and inhibition.J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Jul;35(3):419-26. doi: 10.1037/a0014815. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009. PMID: 19594286 Free PMC article.