Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability
- PMID: 12594317
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa021212
Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability
Abstract
Background: Institutional review boards (IRBs) are charged with safeguarding potential research subjects with limited literacy but may have an inadvertent role in promulgating unreadable consent forms. We hypothesized that text provided by IRBs in informed-consent forms falls short of the IRBs' own readability standards and that readability is influenced by the level of research activity, local literacy rates, and federal oversight.
Methods: To test these hypotheses, we conducted a cross-sectional study linking data from several public-use sources. A total of 114 Web sites of U.S. medical schools were surveyed for IRB readability standards and informed-consent-form templates. Actual readability was measured with the Flesch-Kincaid scale, which assigns a score on the basis of the minimal grade level required to read and understand English text (range, 0 to 12). Data on the level of research activity, local literacy rates, and federal oversight were obtained from organizational Web sites.
Results: The average readability score for text provided by IRBs was 10.6 (95 percent confidence interval, 10.3 to 10.8) on the Flesch-Kincaid scale. Specific readability standards, found on 61 Web sites (54 percent), ranged from a 5th-grade reading level to a 10th-grade reading level. The mean Flesch-Kincaid scores for the readability of sample text provided by IRBs exceeded the stated standard by 2.8 grade levels (95 percent confidence interval, 2.4 to 3.2; P<0.001). Readability was not associated with either the level of research funding (P=0.89) or local rates of literacy (P=0.92). However, the 52 schools that had been made subject to oversight by the Office for Human Research Protections (46 percent) had lower Flesch-Kincaid scores than the other schools (10.2 vs. 10.9, P=0.005).
Conclusions: IRBs commonly provide text for informed-consent forms that falls short of their own readability standards. Federal oversight is associated with better readability.
Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society
Comment in
-
Readability of informed-consent forms.N Engl J Med. 2003 May 29;348(22):2262-3; author reply 2262-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc030704. N Engl J Med. 2003. PMID: 12773662 No abstract available.
-
Readability of informed-consent forms.N Engl J Med. 2003 May 29;348(22):2262-3; author reply 2262-3. N Engl J Med. 2003. PMID: 12774823 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Informed consent for research: a study to evaluate readability and processability to effect change.J Investig Med. 1995 Oct;43(5):459-67. J Investig Med. 1995. PMID: 8528757
-
Consent form readability in university-sponsored research.J Fam Pract. 1996 Jun;42(6):606-11. J Fam Pract. 1996. PMID: 8656172
-
Assessment of medical school institutional review board policies regarding compensation of subjects for research-related injury.Am J Med. 2005 Feb;118(2):175-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.03.045. Am J Med. 2005. PMID: 15694904
-
Reading Level and Comprehension of Research Consent Forms: An Integrative Review.J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Feb;11(1):31-46. doi: 10.1177/1556264616637483. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016. PMID: 27106889 Review.
-
Use of central institutional review boards for multicenter clinical trials in the United States: a review of the literature.Clin Trials. 2013 Aug;10(4):560-7. doi: 10.1177/1740774513484393. Epub 2013 May 10. Clin Trials. 2013. PMID: 23666951 Review.
Cited by
-
Readability assessment of concussion and traumatic brain injury publications by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:923-33. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S37110. Epub 2012 Nov 7. Int J Gen Med. 2012. PMID: 23204856 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding of placebo controls among older people with schizophrenia.Schizophr Bull. 2006 Jan;32(1):137-46. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbi069. Epub 2005 Sep 21. Schizophr Bull. 2006. PMID: 16177271 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Readability of state-sponsored advance directive forms in the United States: a cross sectional study.BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Apr 25;11:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-6. BMC Med Ethics. 2010. PMID: 20416105 Free PMC article.
-
Navigating the perils and pitfalls throughout the consent process in hematopoietic cell transplantation.Blood Rev. 2023 May;59:101037. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2022.101037. Epub 2022 Dec 20. Blood Rev. 2023. PMID: 36577602 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Infringement of the right to surgical informed consent: negligent disclosure and its impact on patient trust in surgeons at public general hospitals - the voice of the patient.BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Oct 28;20(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0407-5. BMC Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 31660956 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources