Clinical and economic outcomes of multivessel coronary stenting compared with bypass surgery: a single-center US experience
- PMID: 12595853
- DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2003.38
Clinical and economic outcomes of multivessel coronary stenting compared with bypass surgery: a single-center US experience
Abstract
Background: Randomized trials comparing multivessel stenting with coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) have demonstrated similar rates of death and myocardial infarction but higher rates of repeat revascularization after stenting. The impact of these alternative strategies on overall medical care costs is uncertain, particularly within the US health care system.
Methods: We performed a retrospective, matched cohort study to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of multivessel stenting and bypass surgery. The stent group consisted of 100 consecutive patients who underwent stenting of >or=2 major native coronary arteries at our institution. The CABG group consisted of 200 patients who underwent nonemergent isolated bypass surgery during the same time frame, matched (2:1) for age, sex, ejection fraction, diabetes mellitus, and extent of coronary disease. Detailed clinical follow-up and resource utilization data were collected for a minimum of 2 years. Total costs were calculated by use of year 2000 unit prices.
Results: Over a median follow up period of 2.8 years, there were no significant differences in all-cause mortality rates (3.0% vs 3.0%), Q-wave myocardial infarction (5.1% vs 4.0%), or the composite of death or myocardial infarction (7.1% vs 7.0%) between the stent and CABG groups (P = not significant for all comparisons). However, at 2-year follow up, patients with stents were more likely to require >or=1 repeat revascularization procedure (32.0% vs 4.5%, P <.001). The initial cost of multivessel stenting was 43% less than the cost of CABG (11,810 dollars vs 20,574 dollars, P <.001) and remained 27% less (17,634 dollars vs 24,288 dollars, P =.005) at 2 years.
Conclusions: Multivessel stenting and CABG result in comparable risks of death and myocardial infarction. Despite a higher rate of repeat revascularization, multivessel stenting was significantly less costly than CABG through the first 2 years of follow-up.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease: results from the ARTS trial in Israel.Isr Med Assoc J. 2003 Aug;5(8):539-42. Isr Med Assoc J. 2003. PMID: 12929288 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease.N Engl J Med. 2001 Apr 12;344(15):1117-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200104123441502. N Engl J Med. 2001. PMID: 11297702 Clinical Trial.
-
Triple vessel revascularization: coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: initial results and five-year follow-up. Comparative costs and loss of working days and wages.J Invasive Cardiol. 1994 May;6(4):125-35. J Invasive Cardiol. 1994. PMID: 10147165
-
Stenting versus surgical bypass grafting for coronary artery disease: systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Ital Heart J. 2003 Apr;4(4):271-80. Ital Heart J. 2003. PMID: 12784781 Review.
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery for cardiogenic shock and multivessel coronary artery disease?Am Heart J. 2010 Jan;159(1):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.035. Am Heart J. 2010. PMID: 20102880 Review.
Cited by
-
Medical costs associated with cardiovascular events among high-risk patients with hyperlipidemia.Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Jun 9;7:337-45. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S76972. eCollection 2015. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015. PMID: 26089693 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic evaluation strategies for individuals with stable chest pain syndrome and suspected coronary artery disease.Clin Imaging. 2017 May-Jun;43:97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Feb 10. Clin Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28273654 Free PMC article.
-
Postoperative complications after elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with sleep-disordered breathing.Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Dec;107(12):1148-1159. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1289-0. Epub 2018 Jun 12. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29943269
-
Hybrid coronary revascularization in high-risk patients.Tex Heart Inst J. 2006;33(4):458-62. Tex Heart Inst J. 2006. PMID: 17215970 Free PMC article.
-
Does anesthesiology residency training result in decreasing intraoperative drug cost from a resident's first to second month's experience in adult cardiac anesthesiology?J Educ Perioper Med. 2012 Jul 1;14(5):E064. eCollection 2012 Jul-Dec. J Educ Perioper Med. 2012. PMID: 27175395 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical