Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 May;29(5):817-24.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1684-4. Epub 2003 Feb 21.

The effect of infusions of adrenaline, noradrenaline and dopamine on cerebral autoregulation under propofol anaesthesia in an ovine model

Affiliations

The effect of infusions of adrenaline, noradrenaline and dopamine on cerebral autoregulation under propofol anaesthesia in an ovine model

John A Myburgh et al. Intensive Care Med. 2003 May.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of infusions of adrenaline, noradrenaline and dopamine on cerebral autoregulation under steady-state propofol anaesthesia with the awake state.

Design: Prospective, randomised, interventional animal study.

Setting: University laboratory.

Subjects: Six studies in two cohorts of adult ewes: awake and steady-state propofol anaesthesia (15 mg/min).

Interventions: In random order, each animal received ramped infusions of adrenaline, noradrenaline (0-40 microg/min) and dopamine (0-40 microg/kg per min).

Measurements and results: Cerebral blood flow (CBF) was measured continuously from changes in Doppler velocities in the sagittal sinus and normalised to a PaCO(2) 35 mmHg. Propofol decreased CBF by 55% relative to pre-anaesthesia values (p=0.0001). All three catecholamines significantly and equivalently increased mean arterial pressure (MAP) from baseline in a dose-dependent manner in both awake and propofol cohorts. Adrenaline significantly increased CBF from baseline in both awake sheep (p<0.01) and during propofol anaesthesia (p<0.001); noradrenaline and dopamine did not statistically increase CBF. When comparing the effects of individual catecholamines with each other within each cohort, no statistically significant difference between the catecholamines was demonstrated. (p>0.05). Using linear regression analysis, normalised CBF was correlated against associated changes in MAP. No significant differences were demonstrated between the slopes of regression lines for adrenaline, noradrenaline and dopamine in either cohort (ANCOVA). There was a statistically significant difference between the intercepts of the awake and propofol cohorts (p<0.0001), but no difference between the slopes (p=0.69).

Conclusions: Over a specific dose range, catecholamine-induced hypertension caused increased CBF during steady-state propofol anaesthesia. This effect was offset by an associated reduction in CBF caused by propofol. The concomitant administration of propofol and catecholamines was not associated with altered autoregulatory function compared to the awake state.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Neurosurgery. 2000 Jul;47(1):199-207 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources