Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Mar;88(2):F98-F100.
doi: 10.1136/fn.88.2.f98.

Comparison of meconium and neonatal hair analysis for detection of gestational exposure to drugs of abuse

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of meconium and neonatal hair analysis for detection of gestational exposure to drugs of abuse

B Bar-Oz et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Meconium and hair are two biological markers of in utero exposure to illicit drugs.

Objective: To compare the sensitivity of the two tests for different drugs.

Setting: Motherisk laboratory which tests in utero drug exposure in Toronto.

Methods: Cocaine, benzoylecgonine, opiates, cannabis, benzodiazepines, methadone, and barbiturates were measured in pairs of hair and meconium samples from the same neonates.

Results: Meconium was marginally more sensitive than neonatal hair for detection of cocaine and cannabis, possibly because it may detect second trimester exposure whereas hair grows only during the third trimester of pregnancy. There was a significant correlation between hair and meconium concentrations of cocaine, cannabis, and opiates.

Conclusion: In cases of clinical suspicion and a negative neonatal urine test, both meconium and hair are effective biological markers of in utero illicit drug exposure. Meconium may be more sensitive, but neonatal hair is available for three months whereas meconium is available for only one or two days. In contrast, the use of meconium, being a discarded material, is more acceptable to some parents than hair testing, which entails cutting scalp hair from the newborn.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. JAMA. 2001 Mar 28;285(12):1613-25 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr. 2001 Mar;138(3):344-8 - PubMed
    1. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2001;39(4):361-6 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr. 1986 Mar;108(3):456-9 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1986 Mar 1;1(8479):459-62 - PubMed

Publication types