Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2003 Mar;43(3):241-5.
doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00040-x.

The value of a second transurethral resection in evaluating patients with bladder tumours

Affiliations
Review

The value of a second transurethral resection in evaluating patients with bladder tumours

Makram Miladi et al. Eur Urol. 2003 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the usefulness of a second transurethral resection for superficial and muscle-invasive bladder tumours.

Methods: A review of the literature relevant to repeat resection for bladder tumours was conducted using Medline Services.

Results: Transurethral resection of the bladder has two shortcomings: underestimating clinical stage, and overlooking other lesions. A second transurethral resection, when performed 2-6 weeks after the initial resection, corrects clinical staging errors in 9-49% of cases and detects residual tumour in 26-83% of cases. A second resection is particularly warranted for T1 tumours since 2-28% of them prove to be muscle-invasive, thus requiring a change in management. For muscle-invasive tumours, a second resection may be performed only if bladder sparing is being considered, as it helps to exclude the presence of tumour sites contra-indicating conservative treatment.

Conclusions: A second transurethral bladder resection may be warranted for T1 tumours, and for invasive tumours when a bladder preservation is planned.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources