The accessibility of abortion services in the United States, 2001
- PMID: 12602753
- DOI: 10.1363/3501603
The accessibility of abortion services in the United States, 2001
Abstract
Context: A woman's ability to obtain an abortion is affected both by the availability of a provider and by access-related factors such as cost, convenience, gestational limits and the provision of early medical abortion services.
Methods: In 2001-2002, The Alan Guttmacher Institute surveyed all known abortion providers in the United States, collecting information on their delivery of abortion services and on the number of abortions performed.
Results: A minority of abortion providers offer services before five weeks from the last menstrual period (37%) or after 20 weeks (24% or fewer), but the proportions have increased since 1993. Providers estimate that one-quarter of women having abortions in nonhospital facilities travel 50 miles or more for services, and that 7% are initially unsure of their abortion decision. The majority of providers (59%) say that these clients usually receive abortions during a single visit. An average self-paying client was charged $372 for a surgical abortion at 10 weeks in 2001, up from $319 in 1997; only 26% of clients receive services billed directly to public or private insurance. Early medical abortions are becoming increasingly available but are more expensive than surgical abortions. More than half (56%) of providers experienced antiabortion harassment in 2000, but types of harassment other than picketing have declined since 1996.
Conclusions: Abortion at very early and late gestations and early medical abortion are more available than before, but charges have increased and antiabortion picketing remains at high levels. Thus, many women still face substantial barriers to obtaining an abortion.
Similar articles
-
Factors hindering access to abortion services.Fam Plann Perspect. 1995 Mar-Apr;27(2):54-9, 87. Fam Plann Perspect. 1995. PMID: 7796896
-
The harassment of U.S. abortion providers.Fam Plann Perspect. 1987 Jan-Feb;19(1):9-13. Fam Plann Perspect. 1987. PMID: 3556539
-
Providing controversial health care: abortion services since 1973.Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):152-7. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80249-x. Womens Health Issues. 1993. PMID: 8274870
-
The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.J Policy Anal Manage. 1993 Summer;12(3):498-511. J Policy Anal Manage. 1993. PMID: 10127357 Review.
-
Pregnancy interruption using mifepristone (RU-486). A new choice for women in the USA.J Nurse Midwifery. 1997 Mar-Apr;42(2):86-90. doi: 10.1016/s0091-2182(96)00154-1. J Nurse Midwifery. 1997. PMID: 9107115 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Outcomes before and after Ohio's Law Mandating Use of the FDA-Approved Protocol for Medication Abortion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.PLoS Med. 2016 Aug 30;13(8):e1002110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002110. eCollection 2016 Aug. PLoS Med. 2016. PMID: 27575488 Free PMC article.
-
Early abortion in family medicine: clinical outcomes.Ann Fam Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;7(6):527-33. doi: 10.1370/afm.1051. Ann Fam Med. 2009. PMID: 19901312 Free PMC article.
-
Implementing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in Norway 1998-2013.Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 1;46(2):643-651. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw270. Int J Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 28031316 Free PMC article.
-
The perspective of rural physicians providing abortion in Canada: qualitative findings of the BC Abortion Providers Survey (BCAPS).PLoS One. 2013 Jun 28;8(6):e67070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067070. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23840588 Free PMC article.
-
Legal barriers to second-trimester abortion provision and public health consequences.Am J Public Health. 2009 Apr;99(4):623-30. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.127530. Epub 2009 Feb 5. Am J Public Health. 2009. PMID: 19197087 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical