Medical care use and selection in a social health insurance with an equalization fund: evidence from Colombia
- PMID: 12605467
- DOI: 10.1002/hec.711
Medical care use and selection in a social health insurance with an equalization fund: evidence from Colombia
Abstract
This paper studies the relationship between health status and insurance participation, and between insurance status and medical use in the context of a social health insurance with an equalization fund (SHIEF). Under this system, revenues from a mandatory payroll tax are collected into a single pool (equalization fund) that reimburses for-profit insurance companies according to a capitated formula. Although competition should induce insurers to control costs without reducing the quality of service necessary to attract consumers, limitations in the capitation formula might induce insurers to select against bad risks, and limitations in the contribution system might induce more healthy individuals to evade enrollment. A three-equation model having social health insurance, private health insurance, and using medical services is estimated using a 1997 Colombian household survey. Consistent with similar studies, participation in SHIEF increases medical care use. On the other hand, the evidence on selection is somewhat mixed: individuals who report good health status are more likely to participate in SHIEF, while those without a chronic condition are less likely to participate in SHIEF.
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Self-selection and moral hazard in Chilean health insurance.J Health Econ. 2003 May;22(3):459-76. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00121-2. J Health Econ. 2003. PMID: 12683962
-
Are Colombian sickness funds cream skimming enrollees? An analysis with suggestions for policy improvement.J Policy Anal Manage. 2004 Aug;23(4):873-88. doi: 10.1002/pam.20052. J Policy Anal Manage. 2004. PMID: 15499708
-
Progressive segmented health insurance: Colombian health reform and access to health services.Health Econ. 2007 Jan;16(1):3-18. doi: 10.1002/hec.1147. Health Econ. 2007. PMID: 16929487
-
Managing risk selection incentives in health sector reforms.Int J Health Plann Manage. 1999 Oct-Dec;14(4):287-311. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199910/12)14:4<287::AID-HPM560>3.0.CO;2-V. Int J Health Plann Manage. 1999. PMID: 11184915 Review.
-
Health plan case mix: definition, measurement, and use.Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 1991;12:111-48. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 1991. PMID: 10122799 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Catastrophic expenditure due to out-of-pocket health payments and its determinants in Colombian households.Int J Equity Health. 2016 Nov 10;15(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0472-z. Int J Equity Health. 2016. PMID: 27832821 Free PMC article.
-
Associations Between Schemes of Social Insurance and Self-Rated Health Comparison: Evidence From the Employed Migrants in Urban China.Front Public Health. 2019 Sep 18;7:253. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00253. eCollection 2019. Front Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31620414 Free PMC article.
-
Step-wedge cluster-randomised community-based trials: an application to the study of the impact of community health insurance.Health Res Policy Syst. 2008 Oct 22;6:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-6-10. Health Res Policy Syst. 2008. PMID: 18945332 Free PMC article.
-
NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE SCHEME: PERCEPTION AND PARTICIPATION OF FEDERAL CIVIL SERVANTS IN IBADAN.Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2021 Jun;19(1):49-55. Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2021. PMID: 35330897 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of subsidized health insurance for the poor: evaluating the Colombian experience using propensity score matching.Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2005 Sep;5(3):211-39. doi: 10.1007/s10754-005-1792-5. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2005. PMID: 16082516
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials