Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Mar 1;69(2):197-203.
doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00317-4.

Brief motivational feedback improves post-incarceration treatment contact among veterans with substance use disorders

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Brief motivational feedback improves post-incarceration treatment contact among veterans with substance use disorders

Tania M Davis et al. Drug Alcohol Depend. .

Abstract

Objectives: To test the efficacy of providing brief motivational feedback to increase post-incarceration substance use disorders (SUD) treatment contact.

Design: Randomized clinical trial (feedback vs. control) with a 2-month post-incarceration follow-up.

Participants: Veterans (N = 73) incarcerated in a county jail system who met SUD diagnostic criteria.

Measures: Baseline assessment included the Addiction Severity Index, the Form-90 assessment of recent alcohol use, and a DSM-IV SUD criteria checklist. The primary outcome was Veterans Administration (VA) appointments. Secondary outcomes were the Addiction Severity Index-Followup and the Treatment Services Review.

Intervention: All participants received baseline assessment. The feedback condition received personalized feedback and encouragement to explore ambivalence about change and treatment in a single interview.

Results: Participants receiving feedback were more likely to schedule appointments at a VA addictions clinic within 60 days of their jail release dates (67 vs. 41%; P < 0.03). Though differences were not statistically significant, more feedback participants attended addictions clinic appointments (47 vs. 32%; ns) and were retained in addictions treatment at 90 days (31 vs. 14%; P < 0.08). Treatment appointments were more likely when intervention occurred close to release. Loss of participants to post-release follow-up interviews was >50%, limiting power to detect significant differences by self-report.

Conclusion: Brief motivational feedback shows promise as a way to link incarcerated individuals to SUD treatment services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types