Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Mar;77(6):3749-58.
doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.6.3749-3758.2003.

Transmembrane domains 1 and 2 of the latent membrane protein 1 of Epstein-Barr virus contain a lipid raft targeting signal and play a critical role in cytostasis

Affiliations

Transmembrane domains 1 and 2 of the latent membrane protein 1 of Epstein-Barr virus contain a lipid raft targeting signal and play a critical role in cytostasis

William F Coffin 3rd et al. J Virol. 2003 Mar.

Abstract

The latent membrane protein 1 (LMP-1) oncoprotein of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a constitutively active, CD40-like cell surface signaling protein essential for EBV-mediated human B-cell immortalization. Like ligand-activated CD40, LMP-1 activates NF-kappaB and Jun kinase signaling pathways via binding, as a constitutive oligomer, to tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors (TRAFs). LMP-1's lipid raft association and oligomerization have been linked to its activation of cell signaling pathways. Both oligomerization and lipid raft association require the function of LMP-1's polytopic multispanning transmembrane domain, a domain that is indispensable for LMP-1's growth-regulatory signaling activities. We have begun to address the sequence requirements of the polytopic hydrophobic transmembrane domain for LMP-1's signaling and biochemical activities. Here we report that transmembrane domains 1 and 2 are sufficient for LMP-1's lipid raft association and cytostatic activity. Transmembrane domains 1 and 2 support NF-kappaB activation, albeit less potently than does the entire polytopic transmembrane domain. Interestingly, LMP-1's first two transmembrane domains are not sufficient for oligomerization or TRAF binding. These results suggest that lipid raft association and oligomerization are mediated by distinct and separable activities of LMP-1's polytopic transmembrane domain. Additionally, lipid raft association, mediated by transmembrane domains 1 and 2, plays a significant role in LMP-1 activation, and LMP-1 can activate NF-kappaB via an oligomerization/TRAF binding-independent mechanism. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of an activity's being linked to individual membrane-spanning domains within LMP-1's polytopic transmembrane domain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Schematic of LMP-1 and LMP-1 variants used in this study: comparison of full-length LMP-1, TMD1,2, TMD1,2Δ55/mycHis, lyLMP-1, Δ25-132, and mycASGPR/LMP-1. TMD1,2 lacks TMDs 3 to 6; TMD1,2Δ55/mycHis is a Myc- and His-tagged deletion of TMD1,2 lacking residues 331 to 386 of LMP-1; lyLMP-1 lacks the cytoplasmic N terminus and first four TMDs (residues 1 to 128); Δ25-132 is essentially lyLMP-1 with the wild-type LMP-1 cytoplasmic N terminus fused to TMD 5 (15); mycASGPR/LMP-1 is a chimera in which LMP-1's cytoplasmic N terminus was replaced with a Myc-tagged heterologous N terminus from the H1 asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) (4).
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Lipid raft association of TMD1,2. 293 cells were transfected with pCMV-based LMP-1, TMD1,2, lyLMP-1, Δ25-132, and mycASGPR/LMP-1 expression vectors. Two days posttransfection, cells were solubilized in a buffer containing 0.2% Triton X-100, homogenized, mixed with an equal volume of 80% sucrose, and overlaid with 30% and 5% sucrose in MNE buffer. Following centrifugation for 18 h at 200,000 × g, fractions were taken from the top of each gradient and resolved on SDS-PAGE gels. Gels were transferred to Immobilon and stained with anti-LMP-1 antiserum. A marker for each LMP-1 protein is shown on the right or left of each blot (transfected 293 cell whole-cell lysate, lane M), and arrows point to the indicated LMP-1 protein. (A) LMP-1, (B) TMD1,2, (C) lyLMP-1, (D) Δ25-132, (E) mycASGPR/LMP-1. The lipid raft, soluble, and pellet fractions are labeled beneath. These results are representative of three independent experiments.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
TMD1,2-induced cytostasis. HEp2 cells were transfected with pCMV-LMP-1, pCMV-TMD1,2, or pCMV-lyLMP-1 and plated on coverslips at clonal density immediately following transfection. Four days postplating, cells were fixed and stained with anti-LMP-1 antiserum. (A) All colonies on a given coverslip were scored for the number of positive cells (LMP-1 immunoreactive) and data are expressed as number of positive cells per colony. Data shown as “1 LMP-1-positive cell per colony” include both individual immunoreactive cells (see part B, LMP-1) and single immunoreactive cells within a colony (see upper panel in part B, TMD1,2). A total of 500 colonies were scored for each transfection. (B) Immunofluorescent images of representative colonies are shown for each transfection; two representative images are shown for each of the introduced plasmids; the name of the introduced plasmid is shown above each equivalent set of images (upper and lower panels). These results are representative of three separate experiments. Both LMP-1- and TMD1,2-positive HEp2 colonies primarily have one to four LMP-1-immunoreactive cells, whereas lyLMP-1-positive colonies primarily have four to eight immunoreactive cells. LMP-1- and TMD1,2-positive cells tend to be multinucleated and much larger than lyLMP-1-positive cells.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Activation of NF-κB by TMD1,2 in 293 cells. 293 cells were cotransfected with RSV-LMP-1 expression vectors encoding LMP-1, lyLMP-1, TMD1,2, or TMD1,2Δ55/mycHis (2 μg and 7 μg), together with an NF-κB-responsive luciferase reporter as described previously (4) and in Materials and Methods. (A) Extracts were assayed for luciferase activity 48 h posttransfection with a Dual Light assay kit (Tropix). Data are expressed as a percentage of maximal LMP-1 activation, with maximal activation by LMP-1 occurring at 2 μg of input DNA (423,310 relative light units [RLU]). The activation detected in the presence of 7 μg of empty vector control (pRC-RSV) is denoted by the dotted line. Solid circles, LMP-1; open circles, TMD1,2; shaded circles, TMD1,2Δ55/mycHis; open squares, lyLMP-1. (B) Extracts from A were assayed for LMP-1 expression by Western blot. Each lane was loaded with 5 × 104 cell equivalents. The expressed protein is shown above the blot, and lanes are marked below the blot with input DNA amounts (2 μg or 7 μg). The amount of LMP-1 protein detected in each lane is representative of duplicate transfections in a single experiment. Arrows point to LMP-1 and lyLMP-1. 721 cells (5 × 105 cells) and tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate- and butyrate-induced B95-8 cells (105 cells) (EBV-positive lymphoblastoid cell lines) were loaded on either side of the blot and served as markers for LMP-1 and lyLMP-1, respectively. Shown is a representative of three independent experiments. TMD1,2 activates NF-κB with a different concentration dependence than LMP-1 via a mechanism involving LMP-1 residues 331 to 386, which include CTAR2.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
Oligomerization of TMD1,2. 293 cells were electroporated with the indicated CMV-based expression vectors and harvested 48 h posttransfection, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-Myc antibody (9E10, Santa Cruz). Immunoprecipitates (IP) and whole-cell lysates (WCL) from transfected cells were resolved on SDS-10% PAGE gels and visualized by Western blot with anti-LMP-1 antiserum as described previously (4) and in Materials and Methods. The introduced LMP-1 protein is shown above each blot, and arrows on the sides of the blots mark each protein's migration. (A) Immunoprecipitation of individually expressed proteins with anti-Myc antibody. (B) Coimmunoprecipitation of LMP-1myc with CΔ55 (LMP-1 deletion mutant lacking 55 amino acids from the C terminus, included as an LMP-1-interacting partner [positive control]), NΔ25 (LMP-1 deletion mutant lacking the cytoplasmic N terminus, included as a noninteracting control), or TMD1,2. (C) Coimmunoprecipitation of TMD1,2 with TMD1, 2Δ55mycHis (a C-terminally truncated TMD1,2 lacking 55 amino acids from the C terminus in pcDNA3.1/mycHis [Invitrogen]). TMD1,2 does not detectably interact with LMP-1 or with itself.
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
Interaction of TMD1,2 with TRAF1, TRAF2, and TRAF3. 293 cells were transfected with CMV-based expression vectors encodingLMP-1 or TMD1,2, with or without pCMV-TRAF1/HA-1 (A), pCMV-TRAF2/HA-1 (B), or pCMV-TRAF3/HA-1 (C). Cells were harvested 24 h posttransfection, and extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA-1 antibodies (F-7; Santa Cruz). TRAF immunoprecipitates (IP) and whole-cell lysates of transfected cells (WCL) were resolved by SDS-10% PAGE and analyzed by Western blot with anti-LMP-1 antiserum. The introduced LMP-1 proteins are shown below each blot, and inclusion of the indicated TRAF in the transfection is noted by a + above each blot (top row). Lanes containing HA-1 immunoprecipitates are noted by + above each blot, and whole-cell lysates are noted by − (bottom row). Individual LMP-1 proteins (LMP-1, TMD1,2, and lyLMP-1) are identified by arrows to the sides of each blot. LMP-1-immunoreactive bands migrating faster than LMP-1 are the result of degradation. LMP-1 and not TMD1,2 or lyLMP-1 is detected in TRAF1, TRAF2, and TRAF3 immunoprecipitates.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahonen, C. L., E. M. Manning, L. D. Erickson, B. P. O. O'Conner, E. F. Lind, S. S. Pullen, M. R. Kehry, and R. J. Noelle. 2002. The CD40-TRAF6 axis controls affinity maturation and the generation of long-lived plasma cells. Nat. Immunol. 3:451-456. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baer, R., A. T. Bankier, M. D. Biggin, P. L. Deininger, P. J. Farrell, T. J. Gibson, G. Hatfull, G. S. Hudson, S. C. Satchwell, C. Seguin, et al. 1984. DNA sequence and expression of the B95-8 Epstein-Barr virus genome. Nature 310:207-211. - PubMed
    1. Clausse, B., K. Fizazi, V. Walczak, C. Tetaud, J. Wiels, T. Tursz, and P. Busson. 1997. High concentration of the EBV latent membrane protein 1 in glycosphingolipid-rich complexes from both epithelial and lymphoid cells. Virology 228:285-293. - PubMed
    1. Coffin, W. F., III, K. D. Erickson, M. Hoedt-Miller, and J. M. Martin. 2001. The cytoplasmic amino-terminus of the latent membrane protein-1 of Epstein-Barr virus: relationship between transmembrane orientation and effector functions of the carboxy-terminus. Oncogene 20:5313-5330. - PubMed
    1. DiMaio, D., C. Lai, and D. Mattoon. 2000. The platelet-derived growth factor B receptor as a target of the bovine papillomavirus E5 protein. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 11:283-293. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances