Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2003 Mar 8;326(7388):532.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7388.532.

Impact of NHS walk-in centres on the workload of other local healthcare providers: time series analysis

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Impact of NHS walk-in centres on the workload of other local healthcare providers: time series analysis

Melanie Chalder et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the impact of NHS walk-in centres on the workload of local accident and emergency departments, general practices, and out of hours services.

Design: Time series analysis in walk-in centre sites with no-treatment control series in matched sites.

Setting: Walk-in centres and matched control towns without walk-in centres in England.

Participants: 20 accident and emergency departments, 40 general practices, and 14 out of hours services within 3 km of a walk-in centre or the centre of a control town.

Main outcome measures: Mean number (accident and emergency departments) or rate (general practices and out of hours services) of consultations per month in the 12 month periods before and after an index date.

Results: A reduction in consultations at emergency departments (-175 (95% confidence interval -387 to 36) consultations per department per month) and general practices (-19.8 (-53.3 to 13.8) consultations per 1000 patients per month) close to walk-in centres became apparent, although these reductions were not statistically significant. Walk-in centres did not have any impact on consultations on out of hours services.

Conclusion: It will be necessary to assess the impact of walk-in centres in a larger number of sites and over a prolonged period, to determine whether they reduce the demand on other local NHS providers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean number of consultations per month across nine emergency departments in the 12 months before and after the opening of a walk-in centre
Figure 2
Figure 2
Consultation rate per month in general practices in walk-in centre sites and control sites. The lines represent the mean
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean consultation rate per month across out of hours services in the 12 months before and after the opening of walk-in centres

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Department of Health. Up to £30 million to develop 20 fast access walk-in centres. Press release 1999/0226. London: DoH; 1999.
    1. Royal College of General Practitioners. Discussion paper on the implications for general practice of NHS Direct and walk-in centres. London: RCGP, NHS Alliance; 1999.
    1. Bell NR, Szafran O. Use of walk-in clinics by family-practice patients. Can Fam Physician. 1992;38:507–513. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferber M, Becker L. Impact of freestanding emergency centers on hospital emergency department use. Ann Emerg Med. 1983;12:429–433. - PubMed
    1. Heaney D, Paxton F. Evaluation of a nurse-led minor injuries unit. Nurs Stand. 1997;12:35–38. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms