Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jan;49(1):1-4.

[Analysis of patients with septic shock due to urosepsis brought on by ureteral calculi]

[Article in Japanese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 12629772
Free article

[Analysis of patients with septic shock due to urosepsis brought on by ureteral calculi]

[Article in Japanese]
Toshiyasu Amano et al. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2003 Jan.
Free article

Abstract

While a ureteral stone is a common disease, it occasionally causes urosepsis and septic shock. We analyzed 6 cases of septic shock due to urosepsis caused by a ureteral stone from August 1998 to September 2001. All patients were female, ranging in age from 38-76 years old (63.8 +/- 15.3). Stones ranged from 4 to 12 ml in size. The results of analysis of bacterial culture from blood and urine revealed E. coli in 4 cases, K. pneumoniae in 1 case and P. mirabilis in 1 case. Treatment, including intravenous transfusion, the administration of vasopressor drugs and antibiotics, and anti-disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) treatments were performed. Percutaneous nephrostomy in 4 cases and ureteral stent indwelling in 1 case were also used for the management of urinary tract. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was performed in 4 patients after improvement of general condition. Furthermore, the 3 most recent patients had also received therapy to remove endotoxins. All patients were diagnosed in a stone-free condition after a combination of these therapies. The mean recovery interval from shock condition to shock-free status seemed to be shorter in the patients that received the endotoxin removal therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types