Efficacy of selected hand hygiene agents used to remove Bacillus atrophaeus (a surrogate of Bacillus anthracis) from contaminated hands
- PMID: 12633189
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.10.1274
Efficacy of selected hand hygiene agents used to remove Bacillus atrophaeus (a surrogate of Bacillus anthracis) from contaminated hands
Abstract
Context: The intentional use of Bacillus anthracis transmitted via the US mail in October-November 2001 resulted in 22 people developing inhalation or cutaneous anthrax. Glove use with handwashing prior to and after contact with potential contaminated environmental surfaces and cutaneous lesions has been recommended. However, only limited data are available on the susceptibility of B anthracis to antiseptics.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of several hand antiseptics (interventions) and soap and water (control) against Bacillus atrophaeus, a surrogate of B anthracis.
Design, setting, and participants: Challenge study conducted among healthy adult volunteers, using the Standard Test Method for Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Health Care Professional Handwash Formulations (American Society for Testing and Materials E 1174-94) to determine the efficacy of various hand hygiene products at wash times of 10, 30, and 60 seconds. Volunteers were excluded if they had eczema, psoriasis, or other chronic skin conditions; nonintact skin; or allergies to any study agent. Study agents were a waterless rub containing 61% ethyl alcohol, a 2% chlorhexidine gluconate preparation, and an antibacterial microfiber towel that releases hypochlorite. A nonantimicrobial soap was used as a control.
Main outcome measure: Reduction of B atrophaeus spores (log10 CFU/mL) on contaminated hands.
Results: Washes of 10, 30, and 60 seconds with either soap and water or 2% chlorhexidine gluconate eliminated 1.5 to 2.0 log10 CFUs/mL of B atrophaeus spores at wash 3. Mean reductions (95% confidence intervals) with 10-, 30-, and 60-second washes with soap and water were 2.4 (2.2-2.5), 2.3 (2.2-2.4), and 2.1 (1.9-2.4) log(10) CFUs/mL, respectively; and with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, 2.1 (2.0-2.3), 1.8 (1.5-2.0), and 1.7 (1.5-1.9) log10 CFUs/mL, respectively. Handwashing with chlorine-containing towels was increasingly effective as the wipe time increased; reductions at 10, 30, and 60 seconds were 1.3 (1.1-1.5), 1.6 (1.2-2.0), and 2.2 (2.1-2.2) log10 CFUs/mL, respectively. A waterless rub containing 61% ethyl alcohol was ineffective in eliminating B atrophaeus spores at all times tested (0 [-0.1 to 0.1], -0.2 [-0.3 to -0.1], and 0 [-0.2 to 0.2] log10 CFUs/mL).
Conclusions: In this evaluation of hand hygiene agents, handwashing with soap and water, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, or chlorine-containing towels reduced the amount of B atrophaeus spore contamination, whereas use of a waterless rub containing ethyl alcohol was not effective in removing spores.
Similar articles
-
Novel strategies for enhanced removal of persistent Bacillus anthracis surrogates and Clostridium difficile spores from skin.PLoS One. 2013 Jul 2;8(7):e68706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068706. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23844234 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Hand hygiene with soap and water is superior to alcohol rub and antiseptic wipes for removal of Clostridium difficile.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;30(10):939-44. doi: 10.1086/605322. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009. PMID: 19715426
-
Decontamination of fluid milk containing Bacillus spores using commercial household products.J Food Prot. 2008 Mar;71(3):473-8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-71.3.473. J Food Prot. 2008. PMID: 18389688
-
Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004 Oct;17(4):863-93, table of contents. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.863-893.2004. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004. PMID: 15489352 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Procedures for hand hygiene in German-speaking countries].Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1996 Dec;199(2-4):334-49. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1996. PMID: 9409922 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Identifying experimental surrogates for Bacillus anthracis spores: a review.Investig Genet. 2010 Sep 1;1(1):4. doi: 10.1186/2041-2223-1-4. Investig Genet. 2010. PMID: 21092338 Free PMC article.
-
Recent actuality about Bacillus cereus and human milk bank: a new sensitive method for microbiological analysis of pasteurized milk.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Jul;37(7):1297-1303. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3249-z. Epub 2018 May 3. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018. PMID: 29725957
-
A step-wise approach towards introduction of an alcohol based hand rub, and implementation of front line ownership- using a, rural, tertiary care hospital in central India as a model.BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 29;15:182. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0840-1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015. PMID: 25924956 Free PMC article.
-
Hydrogels in Hand Sanitizers.Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 24;14(7):1577. doi: 10.3390/ma14071577. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33804917 Free PMC article. Review.
-
S2k-Guideline hand antisepsis and hand hygiene.GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2024 Sep 6;19:Doc42. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000497. eCollection 2024. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2024. PMID: 39391860 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical