Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Apr;89(4):417-21.
doi: 10.1136/heart.89.4.417.

Evolution of statin prescribing 1994-2001: a case of agism but not of sexism?

Affiliations

Evolution of statin prescribing 1994-2001: a case of agism but not of sexism?

S DeWilde et al. Heart. 2003 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To study trends in the use of lipid lowering drugs in the UK, and to assess which patient factors influence prescribing.

Methods: Routinely collected computerised medical data were analysed from 142 general practices across England and Wales that provide data for the Doctors' Independent Network database. Subjects included were people aged 35 years or more with treated ischaemic heart disease, averaging annually over 30,000. The temporal trend from 1994 to 2001 in prescription of lipid lowering drugs and daily statin dose and the odds ratios (ORs) for receiving a statin prescription in 1998 were examined.

Results: Lipid lowering drug prescribing increased greatly over time, entirely because of statins, so that in 2001 56.3% of men and 41.1% of women with ischaemic heart disease received lipid lowering drugs. However, 33% of these patients were on a < 20 mg simvastatin daily equivalent. In 1998 the OR for receiving a statin fell from 1 at age 55-64 to 0.64 at 65-74 and 0.16 at 75-84 years. The age effect was similar in those without major comorbidity. Revascularised patients were much more likely to receive a statin than those with angina (OR 3.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.57 to 4.31). Men were more likely to receive a statin than women (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.54 to 1.71) but this difference disappeared after adjustment for age and severity of disease (OR 1.06). Geographical region had little effect but there was a very weak socioeconomic gradient.

Conclusions: Although prescribing has increased, many patients who may benefit from lipid lowering drugs either do not receive it or are undertreated, possibly because of lack of awareness of the relative potency of the different statins. Patients with angina and the elderly are less likely to receive treatment that may prevent a coronary event.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trends in statin prescription in patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) by sex. LLT, lipid lowering treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trends in statin doses (equivalent daily doses of simvastatin). Simvastatin 20 mg is required to achieve a mean reduction of 25% in total cholesterol.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Statin use among patients aged 35–84 years in whom IHD is diagnosed by practice in 1998 (n = 142) and 2000 (n = 115).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pedersen TR. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian simvastatin survival study (4S). Lancet 1994;344:1383–9. - PubMed
    1. Tonkin A, Alyward P, Colquhoun D, et al. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1349–57. - PubMed
    1. Department of Health. National service framework for coronary heart disease: modern standards and service models. London: Stationery Office, 2000.
    1. Packham C, Pearson J, Robinson J, et al. Use of statins in general practices, 1996–8: cross sectional study. BMJ 2000;320:1583–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brady AJB, Oliver MA, Pittard JB. Secondary prevention in 24 431 patients with coronary heart disease: survey in primary care. BMJ 2001;322:1463. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances