Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Apr;87(4):441-5.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.4.441.

Five year results of viscocanalostomy

Affiliations

Five year results of viscocanalostomy

T Shaarawy et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Apr.

Abstract

Aim: To prospectively study the success rate and complications of viscocanalostomy, a non-penetrating glaucoma surgery.

Methods: Prospective non-randomised consecutive case series of 57 eyes (57 patients) with medically uncontrolled primary and secondary open angle glaucoma. Viscocanalostomy was performed on all participants with injection of viscoelastic in the surgically created ostia of Schlemm's canal as well as in the scleral bed, the superficial scleral flap was loosely sutured. Intraocular pressure, visual acuity, and number of goniopunctures were measured.

Results: The mean follow up period was 34.1 months. The mean preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) was 24.6 mm Hg; while the mean postoperative IOP was 5.6 mm Hg at day 1 and 13.9 mm Hg at 36 month. Patients who achieved IOP below 21 mm Hg with or without medication were 90% at 60 months, complete success rate (IOP<21 mm Hg without medication) was 60% at 60 months. 21 patients (37%) needed Nd:YAG goniopuncture postoperatively to control raised IOP, mean time for goniopuncture application was 9.4 months, mean pre-goniopuncture IOP was 20.4 mm Hg and mean postgoniopuncture IOP was 12.6 mm Hg (p <0.0001).

Conclusion: Viscocanalostomy appears to be a promising modification of filtering surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Superficial scleral flap dissection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Deep scleral flap dissection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Trabeculo-Descemet’s membrane.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Injection of viscoelastic in the surgically created ostia of Schlemm’s canal.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Intraocular pressure before and after viscocanalostomy. Vertical error bars represent ±1 SD.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Evolution of the mean visual acuity after viscocanalostomy. Vertical error bars represent ±1 SD.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Postoperative complications.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Watson PG, Jakeman C, Ozturk M, et al. The complications of trabeculectomy (a 20-year follow-up). Eye 1990;4:425–38. - PubMed
    1. Kao SF, Lichter PR, Musch DC. Anterior chamber depth following filtration surgery. Ophthalmic Surg 1989;20:332–6. - PubMed
    1. Stewart WC, Shields MB. Management of anterior chamber depth after trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1988;106:41–4 - PubMed
    1. Brubaker RF, Pederson JE. Ciliochoroidal detachment. Surv Ophthalmol 1983;27:281–9. - PubMed
    1. Gressel MG, Parrish RK II, Heuer DK. Delayed nonexpulsive suprachoroidal hemorrhage. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:1757–60. - PubMed