Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Mar;9(1):81-4.
doi: 10.1136/ip.9.1.81.

Predictors and severity of injury in assaults with barglasses and bottles

K S Coomaraswamy  1 , J P Shepherd
Affiliations

Predictors and severity of injury in assaults with barglasses and bottles

K S Coomaraswamy et al. Inj Prev. 2003 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Although glasses and bottles are frequently used as weapons in assaults, there is little knowledge on which prevention strategies can be based.

Design: Scrutiny of a random sample of 1288 criminal injury compensation applications.

Objective: To identify predictors and relative severity of glass and bottle injury.

Method: Injury site, severity, treatment, and demographic characteristics of victims and assailants were studied with reference to awards from the UK national Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA).

Main outcome measures: Gender of victims and assailants, injury sites, treatment, and award (UK pounds) as indices of injury severity.

Results: Annual CICA awards to all victims of assaults in licensed premises during 1996-98 amounted to pound 4.08 million (for all glass/bottle assaults: pound 1.15 million = 28%). The mean cost of 746 glass assaults was pound 2347, compared with pound 2007 for 542 injuries from bottle assaults (mean difference pound 340; p<0.01). This difference largely reflected more eye injuries with glasses (26 cases: 3% of all glass assaults) than with bottles (eight cases: 1% of all bottle assaults). Bottle assault was significantly associated with unidentified assailants and scalp injuries; whereas glass injury was significantly linked to pub opening hours (midday to midnight), Thursdays, eye and face injuries, and treatment requiring sutures. Mean age of bottle assault victims (26.1 years) was lower than of glass victims (27.3 years; p<0.01), and same gender assaults were more frequent than between gender assaults for both bottle (p<0.001) and glass (p<0.001) assaults. Female victims were allocated to lower compensation awards more frequently than male victims; this was the case for both bottle (p<0.05) and glass (p<0.01) assaults.

Conclusions: Assaults with bottles caused less serious injury and resulted in lower compensation costs. Injury distribution was linked to victim gender and weapon choice, but not to assailant gender. Prevention strategies should focus on both bottle and glass assaults and should take account of the setting and time in which drinking occurs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Inj Prev. 2000 Mar;6(1):36-40 - PubMed
    1. Br J Plast Surg. 1987 Nov;40(6):614-9 - PubMed
    1. J R Soc Med. 1989 May;82(5):281-4 - PubMed
    1. Med Sci Law. 1989 Jul;29(3):251-7 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1994 Apr 9;308(6934):932-3 - PubMed