Revascularization in severe ventricular dysfunction (15% < OR = LVEF < OR = 30%): a comparison of bypass grafting and percutaneous intervention
- PMID: 12643399
- DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04120-6
Revascularization in severe ventricular dysfunction (15% < OR = LVEF < OR = 30%): a comparison of bypass grafting and percutaneous intervention
Abstract
Background: We sought to determine the optimal approach to revascularization of patients with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction.
Methods: We conducted a single-center observational study of 117 consecutive patients who had severe LV dysfunction (15% < OR = LV ejection fraction < OR = 30%) and underwent either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG, n = 69) or percutaneous revascularization (n = 48) between 1992 and 1997.
Results: The CABG group was younger (62 versus 67 years, p = 0.026), and fewer previous bypasses (7% versus 40%, p < 0.0001) and fewer prior percutaneous revascularizations (16% versus 42%, p = 0.0019) were noted. More vessels were revascularized (3 +/- 0.8 versus 1.5 +/- 0.7, p < 0.0001), and revascularization was more complete by CABG (84% versus 48%, p < 0.0001). Morbidity and mortality at 30 days were similar, and there was no significant difference in 3-year survival (73% versus 67%), although 3-year cardiac event-free survival (52% versus 25%, p = 0.0011) and 3-year target vessel revascularization-free survival (71% versus 41%, p < 0.0001) were significantly better in the CABG group, and LV ejection fraction was significantly improved after CABG. In the subgroup of patients 65 years of age or older and those without proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesions, significant benefit of CABG in cardiac event-free and target vessel revascularization-free survival disappeared.
Conclusions: We found that in clinically selected patients with severe ventricular dysfunction, CABG compared with percutaneous revascularization achieves more complete revascularization, improved LV function, fewer cardiac events, and fewer target vessel revascularizations, but does not affect mid-term survival. A prospective controlled trial with defined criteria for treatment assignment is warranted to confirm our results regarding the two revascularization strategies in patients with severe LV dysfunction.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of five-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with left ventricular ejection fractions≤50% versus >50% (from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).Am J Cardiol. 2014 Oct 1;114(7):988-96. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Jul 16. Am J Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25124184 Clinical Trial.
-
Revascularization in severe left ventricular dysfunction: outcome comparison of drug-eluting stent implantation versus coronary artery by-pass grafting.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Jul 1;70(1):26-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21072. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007. PMID: 17585381
-
Survival following coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in anatomic subsets in which coronary artery bypass surgery improves survival compared with medical therapy. Results from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI).J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Nov 1;38(5):1440-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01571-6. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001. PMID: 11691521 Clinical Trial.
-
Stable coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: The role of revascularization.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 1;90(5):777-783. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27175. Epub 2017 Jul 14. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 28707392 Review.
-
Isolated disease of the proximal left anterior descending artery comparing the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass surgery.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Oct;1(5):483-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.07.001. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008. PMID: 19463349 Review.
Cited by
-
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Improves Survival Without Increasing the Risk of Stroke in Patients with Ischemic Heart Failure in Comparison to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis With 54,173 Patients.Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Aug 27;34(4):396-405. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0170. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019. PMID: 31454193 Free PMC article.
-
A heart failure specialist's perspective on cardiac surgery for heart failure.Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2005 Mar;2(1):46-53. doi: 10.1007/s11897-005-0007-1. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2005. PMID: 16036051 Review.
-
Recent publications by ochsner authors.Ochsner J. 2003 Spring;5(2):57-62. Ochsner J. 2003. PMID: 21765756 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Short- and long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with low, intermediate and high ejection fraction.Cardiovasc J Afr. 2008 Jan-Feb;19(1):17-21. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2008. PMID: 18320081 Free PMC article.
-
Preferred Revascularization Strategies in Patients with Ischemic Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis.Curr Med Sci. 2018 Oct;38(5):776-784. doi: 10.1007/s11596-018-1944-8. Epub 2018 Oct 20. Curr Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 30341512
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical