Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of six silicone-based, resilient denture liners
- PMID: 12644808
- DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2003.41
Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of six silicone-based, resilient denture liners
Abstract
Statement of problem: Adhesion failure between silicone resilient denture lining materials and denture base resin is commonly encountered in clinical practice. Adhesion failure results in localized unhygienic conditions at the debonded regions and often causes functional failure of the prosthesis.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of thermocycling on the tensile bond strength of 6 soft lining materials.
Material and methods: Six commonly used silicone-based resilient denture liners (Ufigel C, Ufigel P, Mollosil, Molloplast B, Permafix, and Permaflex) were chosen for the investigation. The bond strength was determined, in tension, after processing to PMMA. The resilient denture liners for each group (n = 24) were 10 x 10 x 3 mm and were processed between 2 polymethyl methacrylate specimens according to manufacturer's instructions. Two PMMA specimens were prepared by investing brass dies with a 3-mm-thick spacer in a denture flask. Specimens were made by processing the resilient denture liners against the polymerized PMMA block. After polymerization, the brass spacer was removed from the mold, the 2 PMMA resin specimens were trimmed, and the surfaces to be bonded were smoothed. The PMMA block was placed back into the molds and the resilient denture liners were packed into the space made by brass spacer, trial packed, and polymerized according to the manufacturer's instructions. Half of the specimens for each group were stored in water for 24 hours, and the other half were thermocycled (5000 cycles) between baths of 5 degrees and 55 degrees C. All specimens were placed under tension until failure in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The maximum tensile stress before failure and mode of failure were recorded. The mode of failure was characterized as cohesive, adhesive, or mixed mode, depending on whether the fracture surface was in the soft liner only, at the denture base-soft liner interface only, or in both. Failure strength was recorded in kg/cm(2). Results were tested by multiple analysis of variance (ANOVA) for mode of failure (adhesive, cohesive, and mix), 2-way ANOVA (storage-products), and 1-way ANOVA (storage-products interaction, before and after thermocycling). Duncan's test was used to determine whether significant changes in the tensile bond properties of the materials occurred during thermocycling.
Results: Varying degrees of bond strengths were found for soft lining materials and were significantly different (P<.05). Results of this study also indicated that the bond strengths of soft lining materials had significantly decreased after thermocycling except Ufigel C and Mollosil.
Conclusions: Because the adequate adhesive value for soft lining materials is given 4.5 kg/cm(2), all of the materials were acceptable for clinical use.
Similar articles
-
Effect of storage duration on the hardness and tensile bond strength of silicone- and acrylic resin-based resilient denture liners to a processed denture base acrylic resin.J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Feb;99(2):153-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60032-3. J Prosthet Dent. 2008. PMID: 18262017
-
Evaluation of tensile bond strength of heat cure and autopolymerizing silicone-based resilient denture liners before and after thermocycling.Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Jan-Feb;23(1):64-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.99041. Indian J Dent Res. 2012. PMID: 22842252
-
Effect of thermocycling on bond strength and elasticity of 4 long-term soft denture liners.J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Nov;88(5):516-21. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128953. J Prosthet Dent. 2002. PMID: 12474002
-
Bond strength of soft liners to denture base resins and the influence of different surface treatments and thermocycling: A systematic review.J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jun;123(6):800-806.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Nov 5. J Prosthet Dent. 2020. PMID: 31703921
-
Bond Strength of Resilient Lining Materials to Denture Base Resin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Prosthodont. 2018 Dec;27(9):828-841. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12958. Epub 2018 Jul 24. J Prosthodont. 2018. PMID: 30039888
Cited by
-
Peel strength of denture liner to PMMA and polyamide: laser versus air-abrasion.J Adv Prosthodont. 2013 Aug;5(3):287-95. doi: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.287. Epub 2013 Aug 31. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013. PMID: 24049570 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of thermocycling on the tensile and shear bond strengths of three soft liners to a denture base resin.J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Feb;15(1):18-23. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000100005. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007. PMID: 19089094 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of repair methods and materials on the flexural strength of 3D-printed denture base resin.J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Oct;14(5):305-314. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.5.305. Epub 2022 Oct 28. J Adv Prosthodont. 2022. PMID: 36452364 Free PMC article.
-
Bond Strength of Nanocomposite Hard Liner to CAD-CAM Milled, 3D Printed, and Conventionally Fabricated Denture Base Resins.Dent J (Basel). 2024 Aug 23;12(9):275. doi: 10.3390/dj12090275. Dent J (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39329841 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Soft Denture Lining Materials.Materials (Basel). 2014 Aug 12;7(8):5816-5842. doi: 10.3390/ma7085816. Materials (Basel). 2014. PMID: 28788163 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials